PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALTFX vs. APGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALTFX vs. APGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund (ALTFX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ALTFX having a 5.73% return and APGAX slightly lower at 5.59%. Over the past 10 years, ALTFX has underperformed APGAX with an annualized return of 11.46%, while APGAX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.31% annualized return.


ALTFX

1D
0.54%
1M
5.67%
YTD
5.73%
6M
4.98%
1Y
9.72%
3Y*
8.78%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
11.46%

APGAX

1D
-0.63%
1M
3.66%
YTD
5.59%
6M
4.68%
1Y
16.23%
3Y*
19.07%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
16.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALTFX vs. APGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALTFX
AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund
5.73%6.22%5.94%15.97%-27.19%22.64%39.40%33.60%-9.86%37.16%
APGAX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
5.59%12.96%25.09%34.66%-28.96%28.60%34.05%33.77%1.97%31.36%

Correlation

The correlation between ALTFX and APGAX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 1996

0.87

The correlation between ALTFX and APGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALTFX vs. APGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALTFX
ALTFX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
ALTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

APGAX
APGAX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
APGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
APGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
APGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
APGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALTFX vs. APGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund (ALTFX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALTFXAPGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.22

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

1.12

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.94

4.13

-2.18

ALTFX vs. APGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALTFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the APGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALTFX and APGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALTFXAPGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

1.19

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.56

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.83

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.54

-0.26

Drawdowns

ALTFX vs. APGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALTFX drawdown since its inception was -80.01%, which is greater than APGAX's maximum drawdown of -67.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTFX and APGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALTFXAPGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.01%

-67.19%

-12.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.81%

-15.33%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.92%

-21.63%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.87%

-34.04%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.87%

-34.04%

-1.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.63%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.95%

-19.42%

-17.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.28%

4.14%

+1.14%

Volatility

ALTFX vs. APGAX - Volatility Comparison

AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund (ALTFX) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX) at 3.20%. This indicates that ALTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALTFXAPGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

3.20%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

10.91%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.48%

14.36%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

20.16%

-1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

19.67%

-1.62%

ALTFX vs. APGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALTFX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than APGAX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALTFX vs. APGAX - Dividend Comparison

ALTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.80%, more than APGAX's 10.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALTFX
AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund
12.80%13.53%8.18%0.03%2.61%9.99%7.23%6.01%8.36%0.00%4.05%0.00%
APGAX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
10.71%11.31%7.44%1.75%0.97%8.04%2.87%3.66%9.96%4.09%2.74%9.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALTFX and APGAX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALTFX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to APGAX (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALTFX dropped -80.01% vs APGAX's -67.19%.

APGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALTFX and APGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer