PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALTEX vs. SLMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALTEX vs. SLMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Firsthand Alternative Energy Fund (ALTEX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALTEX achieves a 66.80% return, which is significantly higher than SLMCX's 58.65% return. Over the past 10 years, ALTEX has underperformed SLMCX with an annualized return of 14.28%, while SLMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 28.01% annualized return.


ALTEX

1D
6.08%
1M
7.97%
YTD
66.80%
6M
37.64%
1Y
87.90%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
14.28%

SLMCX

1D
3.67%
1M
15.56%
YTD
58.65%
6M
55.34%
1Y
126.30%
3Y*
47.62%
5Y*
26.81%
10Y*
28.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALTEX vs. SLMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALTEX
Firsthand Alternative Energy Fund
66.80%6.62%-6.79%-2.31%-18.26%-5.09%83.88%55.04%-18.56%27.35%
SLMCX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund
58.65%37.32%26.67%44.27%-31.14%38.97%44.45%54.15%-8.12%34.08%

Correlation

The correlation between ALTEX and SLMCX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2007

0.73

The correlation between ALTEX and SLMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALTEX vs. SLMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALTEX
ALTEX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ALTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SLMCX
SLMCX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SLMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SLMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALTEX vs. SLMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Firsthand Alternative Energy Fund (ALTEX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALTEXSLMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.71

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

10.65

-7.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.88

41.17

-32.29

ALTEX vs. SLMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALTEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is lower than the SLMCX Sharpe Ratio of 5.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALTEX and SLMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALTEXSLMCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

5.03

-2.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

1.03

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

1.08

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.73

-0.64

Drawdowns

ALTEX vs. SLMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALTEX drawdown since its inception was -75.48%, which is greater than SLMCX's maximum drawdown of -68.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTEX and SLMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALTEXSLMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.48%

-68.10%

-7.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.91%

-12.33%

-16.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.78%

-29.13%

-39.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.48%

-37.32%

-38.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.48%

-37.32%

-38.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.26%

-13.00%

-24.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.75%

3.18%

+7.57%

Volatility

ALTEX vs. SLMCX - Volatility Comparison

Firsthand Alternative Energy Fund (ALTEX) has a higher volatility of 12.96% compared to Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) at 7.25%. This indicates that ALTEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALTEXSLMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.96%

7.25%

+5.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.09%

20.07%

+13.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.96%

26.09%

+13.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.12%

26.21%

+41.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.36%

26.14%

+25.22%

ALTEX vs. SLMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALTEX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is higher than SLMCX's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALTEX vs. SLMCX - Dividend Comparison

ALTEX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.96%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALTEX
Firsthand Alternative Energy Fund
0.00%0.00%1.50%3.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%9.12%0.05%0.25%0.00%0.00%
SLMCX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund
5.96%9.45%14.27%5.16%9.42%11.75%10.40%11.44%12.33%11.15%8.19%10.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALTEX and SLMCX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALTEX has higher volatility (12.96%) compared to SLMCX (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALTEX dropped -75.48% vs SLMCX's -68.10%.

SLMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.03 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALTEX and SLMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer