PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALSMX vs. QIACX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALSMX vs. QIACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALSMX achieves a 26.71% return, which is significantly higher than QIACX's 7.80% return.


ALSMX

1D
1.82%
1M
5.77%
YTD
26.71%
6M
25.30%
1Y
42.63%
3Y*
25.83%
5Y*
13.86%
10Y*

QIACX

1D
-0.21%
1M
3.54%
YTD
7.80%
6M
9.69%
1Y
24.33%
3Y*
25.23%
5Y*
15.99%
10Y*
16.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALSMX vs. QIACX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ALSMX
Archer Multi Cap Fund
26.71%11.47%21.78%25.14%-20.12%16.58%16.01%
QIACX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund
7.80%21.15%31.07%23.52%-14.16%31.40%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between ALSMX and QIACX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between ALSMX and QIACX has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALSMX vs. QIACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALSMX
ALSMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ALSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ALSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

QIACX
QIACX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QIACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIACX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QIACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIACX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALSMX vs. QIACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALSMXQIACXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.43

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.69

2.82

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.53

13.23

+7.30

ALSMX vs. QIACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALSMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the QIACX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALSMX and QIACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALSMXQIACXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

2.04

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.92

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.58

-0.56

Drawdowns

ALSMX vs. QIACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALSMX drawdown since its inception was -97.87%, which is greater than QIACX's maximum drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALSMX and QIACX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALSMXQIACXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.87%

-60.11%

-37.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-8.65%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.87%

-19.41%

-78.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.87%

-23.05%

-74.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.39%

-0.21%

-96.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.98%

-9.29%

-18.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

1.84%

+0.31%

Volatility

ALSMX vs. QIACX - Volatility Comparison

Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX) at 2.58%. This indicates that ALSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QIACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALSMXQIACXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

2.58%

+2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.27%

9.44%

+3.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.14%

11.99%

+4.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,291.55%

17.38%

+1,274.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,140.59%

18.70%

+1,121.89%

ALSMX vs. QIACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALSMX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than QIACX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALSMX vs. QIACX - Dividend Comparison

ALSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, more than QIACX's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALSMX
Archer Multi Cap Fund
5.65%7.16%3.62%0.46%7.12%1.62%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QIACX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund
4.25%4.58%8.65%1.40%10.90%17.44%3.01%3.34%8.60%0.69%1.12%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALSMX and QIACX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALSMX has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to QIACX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALSMX dropped -97.87% vs QIACX's -60.11%.

ALSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALSMX and QIACX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer