PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALSMX vs. PAGDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALSMX vs. PAGDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A (PAGDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALSMX achieves a 22.33% return, which is significantly higher than PAGDX's 11.72% return.


ALSMX

1D
-0.38%
1M
-2.02%
6M
18.54%
YTD
22.33%
1Y
32.60%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*

PAGDX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.17%
6M
7.54%
YTD
11.72%
1Y
28.49%
3Y*
35.43%
5Y*
18.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALSMX vs. PAGDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ALSMX
Archer Multi Cap Fund
22.33%11.47%21.78%25.14%-20.12%16.58%16.01%0.00%
PAGDX
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A
11.72%36.58%44.15%38.39%-26.25%24.53%37.32%0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between ALSMX and PAGDX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019

0.86

The correlation between ALSMX and PAGDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALSMX vs. PAGDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALSMX
ALSMX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ALSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ALSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

PAGDX
PAGDX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
PAGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PAGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALSMX vs. PAGDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A (PAGDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALSMXPAGDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.27

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.00

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.90

10.23

+3.66

ALSMX vs. PAGDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the PAGDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALSMX and PAGDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALSMX vs. PAGDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALSMX drawdown since its inception was -97.87%, which is greater than PAGDX's maximum drawdown of -38.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALSMX and PAGDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALSMXPAGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.87%

-38.03%

-59.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-9.16%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.87%

-26.37%

-71.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.87%

-36.66%

-61.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.51%

-3.86%

-92.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.06%

-7.33%

-21.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.68%

-0.38%

Volatility

ALSMX vs. PAGDX - Volatility Comparison

Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A (PAGDX) at 5.51%. This indicates that ALSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAGDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALSMXPAGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.24%

5.51%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.77%

13.67%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.39%

17.91%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,292.07%

24.56%

+1,267.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,131.51%

24.92%

+1,106.59%

ALSMX vs. PAGDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALSMX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than PAGDX's 1.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALSMX vs. PAGDX - Dividend Comparison

ALSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, more than PAGDX's 0.03% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALSMX
Archer Multi Cap Fund
5.85%7.16%3.62%0.46%7.12%1.62%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAGDX
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A
0.03%0.03%5.48%2.59%7.53%6.80%14.94%16.97%12.25%8.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALSMX and PAGDX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALSMX has higher volatility (6.24%) compared to PAGDX (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALSMX dropped -97.87% vs PAGDX's -38.03%.

ALSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALSMX and PAGDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer