PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALSMX vs. PAGDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ALSMX vs. PAGDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A (PAGDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ALSMX vs. PAGDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ALSMX
Archer Multi Cap Fund
1.59%11.47%21.78%25.14%-20.12%16.58%16.01%
PAGDX
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A
-3.91%36.58%44.15%38.39%-26.25%24.53%37.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALSMX achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than PAGDX's -3.91% return.


ALSMX

1D
-1.67%
1M
-8.39%
YTD
1.59%
6M
2.41%
1Y
22.31%
3Y*
18.36%
5Y*
9.23%
10Y*

PAGDX

1D
-1.69%
1M
-8.35%
YTD
-3.91%
6M
0.74%
1Y
39.07%
3Y*
33.68%
5Y*
16.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ALSMX vs. PAGDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALSMX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than PAGDX's 1.46% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ALSMX vs. PAGDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALSMX
ALSMX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ALSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ALSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PAGDX
PAGDX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PAGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PAGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALSMX vs. PAGDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A (PAGDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALSMXPAGDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.20

1.53

-0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.76

2.23

-0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.33

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

2.57

-0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.74

13.11

-5.36

ALSMX vs. PAGDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the PAGDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALSMX and PAGDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALSMXPAGDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

1.53

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.69

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.74

-0.74

Correlation

The correlation between ALSMX and PAGDX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ALSMX vs. PAGDX - Dividend Comparison

ALSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, more than PAGDX's 0.03% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALSMX
Archer Multi Cap Fund
7.05%7.16%3.62%0.46%7.12%1.62%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAGDX
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A
0.03%0.03%5.48%2.59%7.53%6.80%14.94%16.97%12.25%8.50%

Drawdowns

ALSMX vs. PAGDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALSMX drawdown since its inception was -97.87%, which is greater than PAGDX's maximum drawdown of -38.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALSMX and PAGDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ALSMXPAGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.87%

-38.03%

-59.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.65%

-13.80%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.87%

-36.66%

-61.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.10%

-9.16%

-87.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.24%

-7.46%

-18.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

2.71%

-0.04%

Volatility

ALSMX vs. PAGDX - Volatility Comparison

Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A (PAGDX) at 5.49%. This indicates that ALSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAGDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ALSMXPAGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.47%

5.49%

+1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

13.43%

-1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.32%

25.50%

-6.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,942.09%

24.48%

+1,917.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,739.04%

25.08%

+1,713.96%