ALSCX vs. RYWCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ALSCX (Alger Small Cap Growth Fund) and RYWCX (Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ALSCX returned 10.46%/yr vs 7.12%/yr for RYWCX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ALSCX charges 1.96%/yr vs 2.26%/yr for RYWCX.

Performance

ALSCX vs. RYWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Small Cap Growth Fund (ALSCX) and Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALSCX achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly lower than RYWCX's 17.14% return. Over the past 10 years, ALSCX has outperformed RYWCX with an annualized return of 10.46%, while RYWCX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.12% annualized return.

ALSCX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 6.88%
• YTD: 12.50%
• 6M: 10.47%
• 1Y: 33.59%
• 3Y*: 13.10%
• 5Y*: -1.20%
• 10Y*: 10.46%

RYWCX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -0.08%
• YTD: 17.14%
• 6M: 15.72%
• 1Y: 28.02%
• 3Y*: 14.55%
• 5Y*: 2.50%
• 10Y*: 7.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALSCX vs. RYWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ALSCX Alger Small Cap Growth Fund	12.50%	7.80%	9.47%	16.25%	-37.61%	-3.35%	63.82%	28.12%	1.20%	25.24%
RYWCX Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund	17.14%	7.76%	7.20%	17.03%	-30.33%	16.37%	15.23%	11.58%	-9.55%	15.23%

Correlation

The correlation between ALSCX and RYWCX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005	0.88

The correlation between ALSCX and RYWCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ALSCX vs. RYWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALSCX

ALSCX Risk / Return Rank: 26
ALSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
ALSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
ALSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
ALSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
ALSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

RYWCX

RYWCX Risk / Return Rank: 45
RYWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
RYWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
RYWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
RYWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RYWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALSCX vs. RYWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Small Cap Growth Fund (ALSCX) and Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALSCX	RYWCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.61	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	2.42	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.28	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	3.48	-1.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.40	11.36	-4.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALSCX vs. RYWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the RYWCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALSCX and RYWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALSCX	RYWCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	1.61	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.04	0.11	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.29	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.26	-0.14

Drawdowns

ALSCX vs. RYWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALSCX drawdown since its inception was -76.39%, which is greater than RYWCX's maximum drawdown of -60.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALSCX and RYWCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALSCX	RYWCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.39%	-60.64%	-15.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.23%	-8.49%	-10.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.29%	-26.39%	-7.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.13%	-40.28%	-9.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.16%	-54.65%	+1.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.85%	-1.70%	-19.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.28%	-13.45%	-21.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.63%	2.59%	+3.04%

Volatility

ALSCX vs. RYWCX - Volatility Comparison

Alger Small Cap Growth Fund (ALSCX) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) at 4.65%. This indicates that ALSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALSCX	RYWCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.81%	4.65%	+3.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.82%	13.35%	+5.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.85%	18.30%	+5.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.96%	22.87%	+5.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.71%	24.72%	+0.99%

ALSCX vs. RYWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALSCX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is lower than RYWCX's 2.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

ALSCX vs. RYWCX - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALSCX nor RYWCX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ALSCX Alger Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	15.11%	0.67%	8.26%	17.08%	0.00%
RYWCX Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	14.52%	0.00%	0.00%	59.93%	0.00%	0.00%	9.26%	3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALSCX and RYWCX in my portfolio?

ALSCX and RYWCX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ALSCX or RYWCX?

ALSCX has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to RYWCX (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALSCX dropped -76.39% vs RYWCX's -60.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.