ALMU vs. SNOW
ALMU (Aeluma, Inc) and SNOW (Snowflake Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — ALMU in Semiconductors, SNOW in Software - Application. Over the past 3 years, ALMU returned 85.05%/yr vs 16.39%/yr for SNOW. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ALMU vs. SNOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALMU achieves a 6.29% return, which is significantly lower than SNOW's 21.94% return.
ALMU
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- -19.10%
- 6M
- -18.38%
- YTD
- 6.29%
- 1Y
- 12.17%
- 3Y*
- 85.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNOW
- 1D
- 2.37%
- 1M
- 11.61%
- 6M
- 19.53%
- YTD
- 21.94%
- 1Y
- 20.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- -0.15%
- 10Y*
- —
ALMU vs. SNOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALMU Aeluma, Inc | 6.29% | 124.44% | 163.79% | 38.10% | 5.00% |
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 21.94% | 42.06% | -22.41% | 38.64% | -12.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALMU and SNOW is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2022 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
ALMU:
$258.61M
SNOW:
$92.71B
ALMU:
-$0.35
SNOW:
-$3.53
ALMU:
60.15
SNOW:
18.04
ALMU:
7.90
SNOW:
44.83
ALMU:
$5.20M
SNOW:
$5.03B
ALMU:
$2.17M
SNOW:
$3.38B
ALMU:
-$6.01M
SNOW:
-$1.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALMU vs. SNOW — Risk / Return Rank
ALMU
SNOW
ALMU vs. SNOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALMU | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 0.37 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.40 | 0.79 | -0.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALMU vs. SNOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALMU drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, smaller than the maximum SNOW drawdown of -72.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALMU and SNOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALMU | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -72.99% | +17.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.37% | -56.30% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.37% | -56.30% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -72.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.05% | -33.44% | -8.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.67% | -48.90% | +25.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.25% | 26.11% | +4.14% |
Volatility
ALMU vs. SNOW - Volatility Comparison
Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) has a higher volatility of 25.12% compared to Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) at 11.89%. This indicates that ALMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALMU | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.12% | 11.89% | +13.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 94.37% | 53.25% | +41.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 124.76% | 66.02% | +58.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 123.13% | 61.99% | +61.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 123.13% | 62.50% | +60.63% |
Dividends
ALMU vs. SNOW - Dividend Comparison
Neither ALMU nor SNOW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ALMU vs. SNOW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aeluma, Inc and Snowflake Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ALMU and SNOW have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALMU has higher volatility (25.12%) compared to SNOW (11.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALMU dropped -55.37% vs SNOW's -72.99%.
SNOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.31 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALMU and SNOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer