ALMU vs. CORZZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ALMU (Aeluma, Inc) and CORZZ (Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — ALMU in Semiconductors, CORZZ in Software - Infrastructure. Over the past year, ALMU returned 40.31% vs 146.16% for CORZZ. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ALMU vs. CORZZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) and Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants (CORZZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALMU achieves a 56.09% return, which is significantly lower than CORZZ's 100.14% return.

ALMU

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 16.72%
• YTD: 56.09%
• 6M: 75.45%
• 1Y: 40.31%
• 3Y*: 101.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CORZZ

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 38.11%
• YTD: 100.14%
• 6M: 76.79%
• 1Y: 146.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALMU vs. CORZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ALMU Aeluma, Inc	56.09%	124.44%	135.75%
CORZZ Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants	100.14%	3.71%	754.72%

Correlation

The correlation between ALMU and CORZZ is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024	0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap ALMU : $465.10M CORZZ : $9.40B
EPS ALMU : -$0.36 CORZZ : -$3.81
PS Ratio ALMU : 86.65 CORZZ : 26.20
Total Revenue (TTM) ALMU : $5.20M CORZZ : $354.74M
Gross Profit (TTM) ALMU : $2.17M CORZZ : $59.79M
EBITDA (TTM) ALMU : -$6.01M CORZZ : $78.17M

Return for Risk

ALMU vs. CORZZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALMU

ALMU Risk / Return Rank: 58
ALMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
ALMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
ALMU Omega Ratio Rank: 61
ALMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
ALMU Martin Ratio Rank: 55

CORZZ

CORZZ Risk / Return Rank: 84
CORZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CORZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
CORZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 82
CORZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CORZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALMU vs. CORZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) and Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants (CORZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALMU	CORZZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.31	2.01	-1.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	2.61	-1.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.33	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.73	3.64	-2.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.38	6.91	-5.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALMU vs. CORZZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALMU Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the CORZZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALMU and CORZZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALMU	CORZZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31	2.01	-1.70
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	2.48	-1.59

Drawdowns

ALMU vs. CORZZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALMU drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, smaller than the maximum CORZZ drawdown of -65.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALMU and CORZZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALMU	CORZZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.37%	-65.20%	+9.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.37%	-40.39%	-14.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.89%	0.00%	-14.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.52%	-21.57%	-1.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.36%	21.25%	+8.11%

Volatility

ALMU vs. CORZZ - Volatility Comparison

Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) has a higher volatility of 50.01% compared to Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants (CORZZ) at 19.79%. This indicates that ALMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CORZZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALMU	CORZZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	50.01%	19.79%	+30.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	92.99%	47.31%	+45.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	129.69%	73.59%	+56.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	123.66%	97.36%	+26.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	123.66%	97.36%	+26.30%

Dividends

ALMU vs. CORZZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALMU nor CORZZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALMU and CORZZ in my portfolio?

ALMU and CORZZ have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ALMU or CORZZ?

ALMU has higher volatility (50.01%) compared to CORZZ (19.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALMU dropped -55.37% vs CORZZ's -65.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CORZZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.