PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALMU vs. APLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ALMU vs. APLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) and Applied Digital Corporation (APLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALMU achieves a 27.20% return, which is significantly lower than APLD's 84.62% return.


ALMU

1D
-6.45%
1M
-3.53%
YTD
27.20%
6M
46.77%
1Y
63.47%
3Y*
93.81%
5Y*
10Y*

APLD

1D
0.15%
1M
-1.31%
YTD
84.62%
6M
73.58%
1Y
358.66%
3Y*
77.54%
5Y*
100.71%
10Y*
127.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALMU vs. APLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ALMU
Aeluma, Inc
27.20%124.44%163.79%38.10%5.00%
APLD
Applied Digital Corporation
84.62%220.94%13.35%266.30%-24.90%

Correlation

The correlation between ALMU and APLD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2022

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALMU:

$379.02M

APLD:

$12.30B

EPS

ALMU:

-$0.36

APLD:

-$0.72

PS Ratio

ALMU:

70.61

APLD:

30.68

PB Ratio

ALMU:

9.46

APLD:

7.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALMU:

$5.20M

APLD:

$390.57M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALMU:

$2.17M

APLD:

$124.93M

EBITDA (TTM)

ALMU:

-$6.01M

APLD:

-$154.66M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALMU vs. APLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALMU
ALMU Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ALMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALMU Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
ALMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALMU Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

APLD
APLD Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
APLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
APLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
APLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
APLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALMU vs. APLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) and Applied Digital Corporation (APLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALMUAPLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.40

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

7.18

-6.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.17

17.65

-15.48

ALMU vs. APLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALMU Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the APLD Sharpe Ratio of 3.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALMU and APLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALMU vs. APLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALMU drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, smaller than the maximum APLD drawdown of -99.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALMU and APLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALMUAPLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-99.73%

+44.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.37%

-50.31%

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.37%

-76.66%

+21.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.64%

-8.82%

-21.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.50%

-74.76%

+51.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.27%

20.44%

+8.83%

Volatility

ALMU vs. APLD - Volatility Comparison

Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) has a higher volatility of 35.99% compared to Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) at 22.67%. This indicates that ALMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALMUAPLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.99%

22.67%

+13.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

94.30%

76.66%

+17.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

127.76%

106.58%

+21.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

123.49%

165.08%

-41.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

123.49%

301.63%

-178.14%

Dividends

ALMU vs. APLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALMU nor APLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ALMU vs. APLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aeluma, Inc and Applied Digital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
1.22M
161.76M
(ALMU) Total Revenue
(APLD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ALMU and APLD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALMU has higher volatility (35.99%) compared to APLD (22.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALMU dropped -55.37% vs APLD's -99.73%.

APLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALMU and APLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer