ALMRX vs. LSHAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALMRX) and Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX).
ALMRX is managed by Alger. It was launched on Nov 8, 1993. LSHAX is managed by Kinetics. It was launched on May 4, 2007.
Performance
ALMRX vs. LSHAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ALMRX vs. LSHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALMRX Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund | -11.69% | 17.01% | 20.02% | 22.68% | -35.28% | 6.17% | 64.25% | 29.79% | -7.77% | 28.75% |
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund | 50.22% | -19.53% | 82.16% | -19.74% | 39.45% | 42.75% | 5.23% | 31.30% | -8.18% | 15.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALMRX achieves a -11.69% return, which is significantly lower than LSHAX's 50.22% return. Over the past 10 years, ALMRX has underperformed LSHAX with an annualized return of 10.96%, while LSHAX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.52% annualized return.
ALMRX
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -11.81%
- YTD
- -11.69%
- 6M
- -13.78%
- 1Y
- 14.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.39%
- 10Y*
- 10.96%
LSHAX
- 1D
- -7.12%
- 1M
- -9.27%
- YTD
- 50.22%
- 6M
- 41.09%
- 1Y
- 5.55%
- 3Y*
- 29.23%
- 5Y*
- 17.40%
- 10Y*
- 19.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ALMRX vs. LSHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALMRX has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is lower than LSHAX's 1.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ALMRX vs. LSHAX — Risk / Return Rank
ALMRX
LSHAX
ALMRX vs. LSHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALMRX) and Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALMRX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.57 | 0.17 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.96 | 0.53 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.07 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 0.12 | +0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.45 | 0.19 | +2.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALMRX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 0.17 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.52 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.65 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.35 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between ALMRX and LSHAX is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ALMRX vs. LSHAX - Dividend Comparison
ALMRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LSHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALMRX Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 77.91% | 12.19% | 8.56% | 7.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund | 7.71% | 11.59% | 4.66% | 9.40% | 1.76% | 0.11% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 4.85% | 3.94% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
ALMRX vs. LSHAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALMRX drawdown since its inception was -73.80%, which is greater than LSHAX's maximum drawdown of -69.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALMRX and LSHAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALMRX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.80% | -69.03% | -4.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.06% | -37.04% | +20.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.01% | -45.79% | -18.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.01% | -50.78% | -13.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.96% | -15.53% | -27.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.14% | -21.94% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.65% | 24.25% | -19.60% |
Volatility
ALMRX vs. LSHAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALMRX) is 6.40%, while Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) has a volatility of 9.76%. This indicates that ALMRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ALMRX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 9.76% | -3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.46% | 27.25% | -12.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.21% | 40.86% | -16.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.57% | 33.69% | +14.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.71% | 30.16% | +7.55% |