ALLW vs. WIMA

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

ALLW (State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF) and WIMA (WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. ALLW is actively managed, while WIMA is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ALLW charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for WIMA.

Performance

ALLW vs. WIMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ALLW

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -2.41%
• YTD: 5.97%
• 6M: 4.42%
• 1Y: 17.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WIMA

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -0.38%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALLW vs. WIMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ALLW State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF	-2.61%
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund	-0.76%

Correlation

The correlation between ALLW and WIMA is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026	0.88

Return for Risk

ALLW vs. WIMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALLW

ALLW Risk / Return Rank: 53
ALLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
ALLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ALLW Omega Ratio Rank: 51
ALLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
ALLW Martin Ratio Rank: 60

WIMA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALLW vs. WIMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ALLW	WIMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.69	—	—

Drawdowns

ALLW vs. WIMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALLW drawdown since its inception was -8.78%, which is greater than WIMA's maximum drawdown of -3.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALLW and WIMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALLW	WIMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.78%	-3.33%	-5.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.73%	-2.11%	-1.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.26%	-0.99%	-0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ALLW	WIMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.99%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.34%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.05%	16.54%	-5.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.69%	16.54%	-3.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.69%	16.54%	-3.85%

ALLW vs. WIMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALLW has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than WIMA's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

ALLW vs. WIMA - Dividend Comparison

ALLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, while WIMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ALLW State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF	4.41%	4.67%
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALLW and WIMA in my portfolio?

ALLW and WIMA have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ALLW or WIMA?

On fees, WIMA is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ALLW or WIMA?

WIMA is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ALLW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ALLW or WIMA?

ALLW has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 0.00% for WIMA.

What is the main difference between ALLW and WIMA?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for ALLW and 0.42% for WIMA.