PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALLW vs. STIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ALLW vs. STIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ALLW vs. STIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ALLW
SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF
4.95%15.04%
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
1.02%4.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALLW achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly higher than STIP's 1.02% return.


ALLW

1D
1.98%
1M
-4.28%
YTD
4.95%
6M
8.24%
1Y
19.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

STIP

1D
0.05%
1M
0.11%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.38%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
3.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ALLW vs. STIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALLW has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than STIP's 0.06% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ALLW vs. STIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALLW
ALLW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ALLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALLW Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ALLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALLW Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

STIP
STIP Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
STIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
STIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
STIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALLW vs. STIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALLWSTIPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.53

2.19

-0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.06

3.34

-1.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.47

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

4.30

-1.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.17

14.63

-4.46

ALLW vs. STIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALLW Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the STIP Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALLW and STIP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALLWSTIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

2.19

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

1.05

+0.46

Correlation

The correlation between ALLW and STIP is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ALLW vs. STIP - Dividend Comparison

ALLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than STIP's 3.93% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ALLW
SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF
4.45%4.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
3.93%4.11%2.62%2.84%6.04%4.15%1.40%2.06%2.44%1.59%0.89%

Drawdowns

ALLW vs. STIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALLW drawdown since its inception was -8.78%, which is greater than STIP's maximum drawdown of -5.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALLW and STIP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ALLWSTIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.78%

-5.50%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-0.95%

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.28%

-0.24%

-4.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.18%

-1.00%

-0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

0.28%

+1.74%

Volatility

ALLW vs. STIP - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) at 0.59%. This indicates that ALLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ALLWSTIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

0.59%

+4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.56%

0.97%

+7.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.08%

1.83%

+11.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.83%

2.76%

+10.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.83%

2.45%

+10.38%