PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALLW vs. DYMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALLW vs. DYMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund Institutional (DYMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALLW achieves a 6.69% return, which is significantly higher than DYMIX's 4.83% return.


ALLW

1D
0.10%
1M
-2.98%
YTD
6.69%
6M
6.94%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DYMIX

1D
-2.19%
1M
-2.72%
YTD
4.83%
6M
8.89%
1Y
26.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALLW vs. DYMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ALLW and DYMIX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025

0.58

The correlation between ALLW and DYMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALLW vs. DYMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALLW
ALLW Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ALLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALLW Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ALLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALLW Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

DYMIX
DYMIX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
DYMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DYMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
DYMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
DYMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
DYMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALLW vs. DYMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund Institutional (DYMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALLWDYMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.30

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

1.96

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.98

4.45

+7.53

ALLW vs. DYMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALLW Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the DYMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALLW and DYMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALLWDYMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

1.64

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.41

1.62

-0.21

Drawdowns

ALLW vs. DYMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALLW drawdown since its inception was -8.78%, smaller than the maximum DYMIX drawdown of -12.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALLW and DYMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALLWDYMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.78%

-12.95%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-12.95%

+5.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.07%

-11.66%

+8.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.21%

-3.79%

+2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

5.70%

-3.98%

Volatility

ALLW vs. DYMIX - Volatility Comparison

State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund Institutional (DYMIX) at 3.46%. This indicates that ALLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DYMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALLWDYMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

3.46%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.05%

11.48%

-2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.76%

15.50%

-4.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.68%

14.47%

-1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.68%

14.47%

-1.79%

ALLW vs. DYMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALLW has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than DYMIX's 1.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALLW vs. DYMIX - Dividend Comparison

ALLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than DYMIX's 6.51% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ALLW
State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF
4.38%4.67%0.00%0.00%
DYMIX
Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund Institutional
6.51%6.82%7.12%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALLW and DYMIX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALLW has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to DYMIX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALLW dropped -8.78% vs DYMIX's -12.95%.

ALLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALLW and DYMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer