ALL vs. HSBC
ALL (The Allstate Corporation) and HSBC (HSBC Holdings plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — ALL in Insurance - Property & Casualty, HSBC in Banks - Diversified. Over the past 10 years, ALL returned 15.27%/yr vs 18.39%/yr for HSBC. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ALL vs. HSBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALL achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly lower than HSBC's 21.78% return. Over the past 10 years, ALL has underperformed HSBC with an annualized return of 15.27%, while HSBC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.39% annualized return.
ALL
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 2.50%
- YTD
- 7.58%
- 6M
- 8.08%
- 1Y
- 13.66%
- 3Y*
- 27.76%
- 5Y*
- 13.66%
- 10Y*
- 15.27%
HSBC
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 21.78%
- 6M
- 27.76%
- 1Y
- 64.27%
- 3Y*
- 43.81%
- 5Y*
- 32.55%
- 10Y*
- 18.39%
ALL vs. HSBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALL The Allstate Corporation | 7.58% | 10.09% | 40.61% | 6.37% | 18.37% | 9.86% | -0.12% | 38.82% | -19.52% | 43.64% |
HSBC HSBC Holdings plc | 21.78% | 67.91% | 34.48% | 39.45% | 7.79% | 20.76% | -31.71% | 1.44% | -16.05% | 36.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALL and HSBC is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 1999 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ALL and HSBC has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
ALL:
$58.20B
HSBC:
$320.51B
ALL:
$45.76
HSBC:
$6.38
ALL:
4.84
HSBC:
14.52
ALL:
0.13
HSBC:
0.71
ALL:
0.88
HSBC:
2.52
ALL:
1.97
HSBC:
1.84
ALL:
$67.14B
HSBC:
$128.37B
ALL:
$19.06B
HSBC:
$65.42B
ALL:
$13.09B
HSBC:
$34.27B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALL vs. HSBC — Risk / Return Rank
ALL
HSBC
ALL vs. HSBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Allstate Corporation (ALL) and HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALL | HSBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.40 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 3.80 | -2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.90 | 13.41 | -10.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALL vs. HSBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALL drawdown since its inception was -77.03%, roughly equal to the maximum HSBC drawdown of -74.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALL and HSBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALL | HSBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.03% | -74.47% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -16.28% | +4.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.11% | -21.83% | +7.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.35% | -31.80% | +4.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.39% | -62.26% | +20.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -2.67% | +1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.43% | -24.09% | +7.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 4.61% | -0.15% |
Volatility
ALL vs. HSBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Allstate Corporation (ALL) is 8.80%, while HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) has a volatility of 10.18%. This indicates that ALL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALL | HSBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.80% | 10.18% | -1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.29% | 22.25% | -4.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.73% | 27.11% | -3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.46% | 25.95% | -0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.95% | 25.62% | -0.67% |
Dividends
ALL vs. HSBC - Dividend Comparison
ALL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than HSBC's 4.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALL The Allstate Corporation | 1.88% | 1.92% | 1.91% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.75% | 1.96% | 1.78% | 2.23% | 1.41% | 1.78% | 1.93% |
HSBC HSBC Holdings plc | 4.05% | 4.19% | 8.29% | 6.54% | 4.33% | 3.65% | 4.05% | 6.52% | 6.20% | 4.94% | 6.35% | 6.33% |
Financials
ALL vs. HSBC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Allstate Corporation and HSBC Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ALL vs. HSBC - Profitability Comparison
ALL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Allstate Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 16.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
HSBC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HSBC Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 16.93B and revenue of 32.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.4%.
ALL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Allstate Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 16.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
HSBC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HSBC Holdings plc reported an operating income of 9.36B and revenue of 32.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.
ALL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Allstate Corporation reported a net income of 2.46B and revenue of 16.94B, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.
HSBC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HSBC Holdings plc reported a net income of 7.33B and revenue of 32.92B, resulting in a net margin of 22.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ALL and HSBC have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HSBC has higher volatility (10.18%) compared to ALL (8.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALL dropped -77.03% vs HSBC's -74.47%.
HSBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALL and HSBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer