PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALKS vs. PSIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALKS vs. PSIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alkermes plc (ALKS) and AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALKS achieves a 58.54% return, which is significantly higher than PSIL's 12.35% return.


ALKS

1D
0.18%
1M
18.36%
YTD
58.54%
6M
57.47%
1Y
48.71%
3Y*
11.28%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
0.70%

PSIL

1D
-4.32%
1M
-3.41%
YTD
12.35%
6M
10.46%
1Y
52.66%
3Y*
6.03%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALKS vs. PSIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ALKS
Alkermes plc
58.54%-2.71%3.68%6.16%12.34%-24.21%
PSIL
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF
12.35%74.55%-19.50%-25.12%-67.24%-42.72%

Correlation

The correlation between ALKS and PSIL is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALKS vs. PSIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALKS
ALKS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ALKS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALKS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALKS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ALKS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALKS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

PSIL
PSIL Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PSIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSIL Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PSIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSIL Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALKS vs. PSIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alkermes plc (ALKS) and AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALKSPSILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.23

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

2.60

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.11

5.38

-0.27

ALKS vs. PSIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALKS Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the PSIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALKS and PSIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALKS vs. PSIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALKS drawdown since its inception was -96.14%, roughly equal to the maximum PSIL drawdown of -92.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALKS and PSIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALKSPSILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.14%

-92.72%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.20%

-20.38%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.58%

-64.62%

+33.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.76%

-78.15%

+23.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.23%

-76.71%

+9.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.55%

9.81%

-0.26%

Volatility

ALKS vs. PSIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alkermes plc (ALKS) is 10.43%, while AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) has a volatility of 12.21%. This indicates that ALKS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALKSPSILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.43%

12.21%

-1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.28%

28.74%

+1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.79%

42.53%

-1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.33%

63.03%

-25.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.31%

63.03%

-21.72%

Dividends

ALKS vs. PSIL - Dividend Comparison

ALKS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ALKS
Alkermes plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSIL
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF
8.90%10.95%1.49%0.24%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALKS and PSIL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSIL has higher volatility (12.21%) compared to ALKS (10.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALKS dropped -96.14% vs PSIL's -92.72%.

PSIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALKS and PSIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer