ALFAX vs. RFIMX
ALFAX (Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund) and RFIMX (Ranger Micro Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ALFAX returned 4.93%/yr vs 2.07%/yr for RFIMX. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ALFAX charges 1.40%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for RFIMX.
Performance
ALFAX vs. RFIMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALFAX achieves a 16.08% return, which is significantly higher than RFIMX's 14.23% return.
ALFAX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- YTD
- 16.08%
- 1Y
- 25.19%
- 3Y*
- 12.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.47%
RFIMX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -6.07%
- 6M
- 7.05%
- YTD
- 14.23%
- 1Y
- 23.84%
- 3Y*
- 4.86%
- 5Y*
- 2.07%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
ALFAX vs. RFIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALFAX Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund | 16.08% | 8.80% | 13.18% | 13.92% | -23.50% | 15.01% | 26.16% | 24.95% | -1.18% |
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund | 14.23% | 1.99% | 11.52% | 9.14% | -24.26% | 30.58% | 44.44% | 24.94% | -0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALFAX and RFIMX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between ALFAX and RFIMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALFAX vs. RFIMX — Risk / Return Rank
ALFAX
RFIMX
ALFAX vs. RFIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) and Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALFAX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.20 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 2.05 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.77 | 6.13 | +1.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALFAX vs. RFIMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALFAX drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, smaller than the maximum RFIMX drawdown of -99.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALFAX and RFIMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALFAX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.11% | -99.41% | +42.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.31% | -11.07% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.01% | -99.41% | +74.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.88% | -99.41% | +65.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.72% | -99.14% | +93.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.81% | -30.77% | +17.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 3.70% | -0.67% |
Volatility
ALFAX vs. RFIMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) is 5.52%, while Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that ALFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALFAX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 6.44% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.96% | 15.11% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.48% | 20.00% | -1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.02% | 5,376.38% | -5,356.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.75% | 4,357.49% | -4,336.74% |
ALFAX vs. RFIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALFAX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is lower than RFIMX's 1.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALFAX vs. RFIMX - Dividend Comparison
ALFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than RFIMX's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALFAX Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund | 4.57% | 5.30% | 0.80% | 0.46% | 6.94% | 5.38% | 7.99% | 14.66% | 16.61% | 11.96% | 11.85% | 15.83% |
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund | 1.16% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 47.82% | 71.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ALFAX and RFIMX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RFIMX has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to ALFAX (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALFAX dropped -57.11% vs RFIMX's -99.41%.
ALFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALFAX and RFIMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer