PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALFAX vs. OBMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALFAX vs. OBMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) and Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALFAX achieves a 18.69% return, which is significantly lower than OBMCX's 45.67% return. Over the past 10 years, ALFAX has underperformed OBMCX with an annualized return of 10.51%, while OBMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.63% annualized return.


ALFAX

1D
0.76%
1M
4.83%
YTD
18.69%
6M
18.13%
1Y
32.77%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
5.22%
10Y*
10.51%

OBMCX

1D
2.91%
1M
3.70%
YTD
45.67%
6M
45.60%
1Y
77.10%
3Y*
29.76%
5Y*
19.97%
10Y*
21.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALFAX vs. OBMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALFAX
Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund
18.69%8.80%13.18%13.92%-23.50%15.01%26.16%24.95%-9.72%20.61%
OBMCX
Oberweis Micro Cap Fund
45.67%14.70%22.82%18.87%-10.57%53.20%29.91%21.94%-12.04%27.90%

Correlation

The correlation between ALFAX and OBMCX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1998

0.86

The correlation between ALFAX and OBMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALFAX vs. OBMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALFAX
ALFAX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ALFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ALFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

OBMCX
OBMCX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
OBMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OBMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
OBMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
OBMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
OBMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALFAX vs. OBMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) and Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALFAXOBMCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.03

3.24

-1.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.87

3.90

-1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.51

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

6.47

-3.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.75

25.98

-13.23

ALFAX vs. OBMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is lower than the OBMCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALFAX and OBMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALFAXOBMCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

3.24

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.77

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.84

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.45

-0.02

Drawdowns

ALFAX vs. OBMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALFAX drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, smaller than the maximum OBMCX drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALFAX and OBMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALFAXOBMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.11%

-68.24%

+11.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.31%

-12.45%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.01%

-28.11%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.88%

-28.11%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.29%

-50.04%

+9.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

0.00%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.87%

-16.42%

+3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

3.09%

-0.42%

Volatility

ALFAX vs. OBMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) is 5.84%, while Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX) has a volatility of 8.26%. This indicates that ALFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OBMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALFAXOBMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

8.26%

-2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.10%

18.66%

-5.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.86%

24.89%

-8.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.86%

26.20%

-6.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.72%

25.88%

-5.16%

ALFAX vs. OBMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALFAX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is lower than OBMCX's 1.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALFAX vs. OBMCX - Dividend Comparison

ALFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than OBMCX's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALFAX
Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund
4.47%5.30%0.80%0.46%6.94%5.38%7.99%14.66%16.61%11.96%11.85%15.83%
OBMCX
Oberweis Micro Cap Fund
0.97%1.41%2.53%0.00%1.37%24.35%0.00%0.00%19.67%11.76%0.05%3.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALFAX and OBMCX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OBMCX has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to ALFAX (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALFAX dropped -57.11% vs OBMCX's -68.24%.

OBMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALFAX and OBMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer