ALBAX vs. AAIZX
ALBAX (Alger Growth & Income Fund) and AAIZX (Alger AI Enablers & Adopters Z) are both mutual funds - ALBAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Alger, while AAIZX is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Alger. Over the past year, ALBAX returned 35.27% vs 65.77% for AAIZX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ALBAX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for AAIZX.
Performance
ALBAX vs. AAIZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALBAX achieves a 13.85% return, which is significantly lower than AAIZX's 28.04% return.
ALBAX
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 13.85%
- 6M
- 12.67%
- 1Y
- 35.27%
- 3Y*
- 22.73%
- 5Y*
- 15.07%
- 10Y*
- 15.46%
AAIZX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 13.74%
- YTD
- 28.04%
- 6M
- 27.96%
- 1Y
- 65.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALBAX vs. AAIZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ALBAX Alger Growth & Income Fund | 13.85% | 19.89% | 13.38% |
AAIZX Alger AI Enablers & Adopters Z | 28.04% | 41.00% | 33.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALBAX and AAIZX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2024 | 0.78 |
The correlation between ALBAX and AAIZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALBAX vs. AAIZX — Risk / Return Rank
ALBAX
AAIZX
ALBAX vs. AAIZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX) and Alger AI Enablers & Adopters Z (AAIZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALBAX | AAIZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.47 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.60 | 3.91 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.90 | 11.89 | +9.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALBAX | AAIZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.01 | 3.06 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 1.87 | -1.20 |
Drawdowns
ALBAX vs. AAIZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALBAX drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, which is greater than AAIZX's maximum drawdown of -29.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALBAX and AAIZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALBAX | AAIZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.56% | -29.00% | -11.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.86% | -17.47% | +9.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -5.00% | -2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 5.73% | -4.00% |
Volatility
ALBAX vs. AAIZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX) is 3.06%, while Alger AI Enablers & Adopters Z (AAIZX) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that ALBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAIZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALBAX | AAIZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 5.22% | -2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.22% | 16.75% | -7.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.05% | 22.33% | -10.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 27.44% | -11.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 27.44% | -10.19% |
ALBAX vs. AAIZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALBAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than AAIZX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALBAX vs. AAIZX - Dividend Comparison
ALBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than AAIZX's 4.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAIZX Alger AI Enablers & Adopters Z | 4.93% | 6.31% | 4.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ALBAX Alger Growth & Income Fund | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.08% | 0.98% | 1.24% | 4.17% | 2.55% | 5.00% | 6.75% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ALBAX and AAIZX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAIZX has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to ALBAX (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALBAX dropped -40.56% vs AAIZX's -29.00%.
AAIZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 3.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALBAX and AAIZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer