PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALAR vs. ROOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ALAR vs. ROOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alarum Technologies Ltd. (ALAR) and Root, Inc. (ROOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALAR achieves a -1.98% return, which is significantly higher than ROOT's -29.30% return.


ALAR

1D
-8.29%
1M
8.03%
YTD
-1.98%
6M
11.24%
1Y
-23.89%
3Y*
52.74%
5Y*
-9.95%
10Y*

ROOT

1D
-1.77%
1M
-11.00%
YTD
-29.30%
6M
-31.57%
1Y
-63.12%
3Y*
66.92%
5Y*
-23.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALAR vs. ROOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ALAR
Alarum Technologies Ltd.
-1.98%-19.13%36.73%223.33%-66.20%-50.00%42.00%
ROOT
Root, Inc.
-29.30%-0.50%592.65%133.41%-91.95%-80.27%-39.58%

Correlation

The correlation between ALAR and ROOT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2020

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALAR:

$49.87M

ROOT:

$878.40M

EPS

ALAR:

$0.15

ROOT:

$3.35

PE Ratio

ALAR:

55.43

ROOT:

15.23

PEG Ratio

ALAR:

0.16

ROOT:

0.56

PS Ratio

ALAR:

1.40

ROOT:

0.55

PB Ratio

ALAR:

1.49

ROOT:

4.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALAR:

$45.33M

ROOT:

$1.56B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALAR:

$26.25M

ROOT:

$279.50M

EBITDA (TTM)

ALAR:

$2.16M

ROOT:

$88.80M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALAR vs. ROOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALAR
ALAR Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ALAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAR Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAR Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

ROOT
ROOT Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ROOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROOT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
ROOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALAR vs. ROOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alarum Technologies Ltd. (ALAR) and Root, Inc. (ROOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALARROOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.83

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

-0.93

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.57

-1.35

+0.79

ALAR vs. ROOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALAR Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is higher than the ROOT Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALAR and ROOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALAR vs. ROOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALAR drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, roughly equal to the maximum ROOT drawdown of -99.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAR and ROOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALARROOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.95%

-99.29%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.10%

-67.76%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.82%

-75.68%

-12.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.80%

-98.26%

+8.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.73%

-89.49%

-10.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-95.60%

-83.76%

-11.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.17%

48.09%

-5.92%

Volatility

ALAR vs. ROOT - Volatility Comparison

Alarum Technologies Ltd. (ALAR) has a higher volatility of 38.54% compared to Root, Inc. (ROOT) at 24.40%. This indicates that ALAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALARROOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

38.54%

24.40%

+14.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.51%

46.24%

+11.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

78.29%

69.01%

+9.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.24%

101.75%

-4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

104.79%

100.10%

+4.69%

Dividends

ALAR vs. ROOT - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALAR nor ROOT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ALAR vs. ROOT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alarum Technologies Ltd. and Root, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
11.71M
393.50M
(ALAR) Total Revenue
(ROOT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ALAR vs. ROOT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alarum Technologies Ltd. and Root, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
61.7%
0
Portfolio components
ALAR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alarum Technologies Ltd. reported a gross profit of 7.23M and revenue of 11.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.7%.

ROOT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Root, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 393.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ALAR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alarum Technologies Ltd. reported an operating income of 809.00K and revenue of 11.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.9%.

ROOT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Root, Inc. reported an operating income of 40.90M and revenue of 393.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.4%.

ALAR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alarum Technologies Ltd. reported a net income of 593.00K and revenue of 11.71M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.

ROOT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Root, Inc. reported a net income of 34.20M and revenue of 393.50M, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ALAR and ROOT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALAR has higher volatility (38.54%) compared to ROOT (24.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALAR dropped -99.95% vs ROOT's -99.29%.

ALAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.31 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALAR and ROOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer