PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALAB vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALAB vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALAB achieves a 118.53% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 10.85% return.


ALAB

1D
2.19%
1M
80.64%
YTD
118.53%
6M
138.39%
1Y
282.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IVV

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALAB vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ALAB
Astera Labs, Inc.
118.53%25.60%113.53%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.85%17.85%13.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ALAB and IVV is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALAB vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALAB
ALAB Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ALAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAB Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAB Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALAB vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALABIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.43

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.72

3.17

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.31

14.71

-5.40

ALAB vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALAB Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALAB and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALABIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01

2.39

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

0.45

+0.89

Drawdowns

ALAB vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALAB drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAB and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALABIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.69%

-55.25%

-8.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.19%

-8.89%

-51.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.76%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.85%

-10.78%

-19.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.49%

1.91%

+28.58%

Volatility

ALAB vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) has a higher volatility of 29.16% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.87%. This indicates that ALAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALABIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.16%

2.87%

+26.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.78%

8.90%

+61.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

94.41%

11.80%

+82.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

92.55%

16.88%

+75.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

92.55%

18.05%

+74.50%

Dividends

ALAB vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

ALAB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALAB
Astera Labs, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALAB and IVV have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALAB has higher volatility (29.16%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALAB dropped -63.69% vs IVV's -55.25%.

ALAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALAB and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer