PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALAB vs. FLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ALAB vs. FLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Flex Ltd. (FLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALAB achieves a 120.70% return, which is significantly lower than FLEX's 147.78% return.


ALAB

1D
-0.09%
1M
57.79%
YTD
120.70%
6M
146.66%
1Y
309.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLEX

1D
-1.50%
1M
8.60%
YTD
147.78%
6M
117.60%
1Y
247.11%
3Y*
116.67%
5Y*
71.04%
10Y*
35.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALAB vs. FLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ALAB
Astera Labs, Inc.
120.70%25.60%152.00%
FLEX
Flex Ltd.
147.78%57.38%42.13%

Correlation

The correlation between ALAB and FLEX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2024

0.49

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALAB:

$66.51B

FLEX:

$55.99B

EPS

ALAB:

$1.48

FLEX:

$2.33

PE Ratio

ALAB:

247.31

FLEX:

64.26

PS Ratio

ALAB:

66.09

FLEX:

2.03

PB Ratio

ALAB:

44.52

FLEX:

10.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALAB:

$1.00B

FLEX:

$27.91B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALAB:

$760.99M

FLEX:

$2.57B

EBITDA (TTM)

ALAB:

$253.12M

FLEX:

$1.66B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALAB vs. FLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALAB
ALAB Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ALAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAB Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAB Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FLEX
FLEX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALAB vs. FLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Flex Ltd. (FLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALABFLEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.60

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.84

13.34

-8.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.53

31.62

-22.09

ALAB vs. FLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALAB Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is comparable to the FLEX Sharpe Ratio of 3.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALAB and FLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALAB vs. FLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALAB drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, smaller than the maximum FLEX drawdown of -96.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAB and FLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALABFLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.69%

-96.37%

+32.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.19%

-18.38%

-41.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-7.55%

+7.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.48%

-55.27%

+25.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.50%

7.74%

+22.76%

Volatility

ALAB vs. FLEX - Volatility Comparison

Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) has a higher volatility of 32.05% compared to Flex Ltd. (FLEX) at 19.36%. This indicates that ALAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALABFLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.05%

19.36%

+12.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.52%

50.61%

+19.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

96.04%

61.43%

+34.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.49%

47.26%

+46.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.49%

45.86%

+47.63%

Dividends

ALAB vs. FLEX - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALAB nor FLEX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
ALAB
Astera Labs, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLEX
Flex Ltd.
0.00%0.00%21.00%

Financials

ALAB vs. FLEX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Astera Labs, Inc. and Flex Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
308.36M
7.48B
(ALAB) Total Revenue
(FLEX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ALAB vs. FLEX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Astera Labs, Inc. and Flex Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
76.3%
9.4%
Portfolio components
ALAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 235.14M and revenue of 308.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.

FLEX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flex Ltd. reported a gross profit of 702.00M and revenue of 7.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.4%.

ALAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported an operating income of 61.83M and revenue of 308.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.

FLEX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flex Ltd. reported an operating income of 372.00M and revenue of 7.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.

ALAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported a net income of 80.31M and revenue of 308.36M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.

FLEX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flex Ltd. reported a net income of 250.00M and revenue of 7.48B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ALAB and FLEX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALAB has higher volatility (32.05%) compared to FLEX (19.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALAB dropped -63.69% vs FLEX's -96.37%.

FLEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.99 vs 3.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALAB and FLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer