FLEX vs. COST
Compare and contrast key facts about Flex Ltd. (FLEX) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLEX or COST.
Correlation
The correlation between FLEX and COST is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FLEX vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FLEX:
2.32
COST:
2.60
FLEX:
5.69
COST:
3.20
FLEX:
1.70
COST:
1.46
FLEX:
5.87
COST:
4.72
FLEX:
27.40
COST:
12.17
FLEX:
6.83%
COST:
3.98%
FLEX:
80.71%
COST:
18.66%
FLEX:
-96.37%
COST:
-53.39%
FLEX:
-6.44%
COST:
-4.08%
Fundamentals
FLEX:
$14.50B
COST:
$435.99B
FLEX:
$2.08
COST:
$16.98
FLEX:
17.98
COST:
57.84
FLEX:
0.97
COST:
5.99
FLEX:
$24.48B
COST:
$258.81B
FLEX:
$2.03B
COST:
$32.80B
FLEX:
$1.12B
COST:
$12.25B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLEX achieves a 178.93% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 45.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLEX having a 22.58% annualized return and COST not far ahead at 23.42%.
FLEX
178.93%
-2.99%
26.03%
182.64%
46.50%
22.58%
COST
45.38%
2.80%
12.78%
47.55%
28.68%
23.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLEX vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flex Ltd. (FLEX) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLEX vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
FLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.38%, more than COST's 2.04% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLEX Flex Ltd. | 21.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 2.04% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% | 0.97% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
FLEX vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLEX drawdown since its inception was -96.37%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLEX and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLEX vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Flex Ltd. (FLEX) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.84%. This indicates that FLEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FLEX vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flex Ltd. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities