PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FLEX vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FLEXCOST
YTD Return174.02%42.08%
1Y Return221.03%65.88%
3Y Return (Ann)64.16%23.55%
5Y Return (Ann)47.72%27.30%
10Y Return (Ann)22.42%23.65%
Sharpe Ratio2.723.37
Sortino Ratio6.234.00
Omega Ratio1.781.60
Calmar Ratio5.136.44
Martin Ratio33.4116.66
Ulcer Index6.58%3.97%
Daily Std Dev80.92%19.61%
Max Drawdown-96.37%-53.39%
Current Drawdown-5.31%-1.21%

Fundamentals


FLEXCOST
Market Cap$15.14B$413.33B
EPS$2.08$16.61
PE Ratio18.7756.16
PEG Ratio0.975.84
Total Revenue (TTM)$24.48B$254.45B
Gross Profit (TTM)$2.03B$32.10B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.47B$10.63B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between FLEX and COST is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FLEX vs. COST - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FLEX achieves a 174.02% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 42.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FLEX has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 22.42%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.65% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
30.94%
20.19%
FLEX
COST

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLEX vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flex Ltd. (FLEX) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLEX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLEX, currently valued at 2.72, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.72
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLEX, currently valued at 6.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.006.23
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FLEX, currently valued at 1.78, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.78
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLEX, currently valued at 5.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.005.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FLEX, currently valued at 33.41, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0033.41
COST
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COST, currently valued at 3.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.37
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for COST, currently valued at 4.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.00
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for COST, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.60
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for COST, currently valued at 6.44, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.006.44
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for COST, currently valued at 16.66, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0016.66

FLEX vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the COST Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLEX and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.504.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.72
3.37
FLEX
COST

Dividends

FLEX vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

FLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.76%, more than COST's 2.09% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FLEX
Flex Ltd.
21.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
2.09%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%1.01%

Drawdowns

FLEX vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLEX drawdown since its inception was -96.37%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLEX and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-5.31%
-1.21%
FLEX
COST

Volatility

FLEX vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Flex Ltd. (FLEX) has a higher volatility of 11.55% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.56%. This indicates that FLEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.55%
4.56%
FLEX
COST

Financials

FLEX vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flex Ltd. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items