AKRE vs. QLC
AKRE (Akre Focus ETF) and QLC (FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - AKRE is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Akre Capital, while QLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index. AKRE is actively managed, while QLC is passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AKRE charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QLC.
Performance
AKRE vs. QLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AKRE achieves a -16.27% return, which is significantly lower than QLC's 12.12% return.
AKRE
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- -16.27%
- 6M
- -14.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLC
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 5.15%
- YTD
- 12.12%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 33.91%
- 3Y*
- 25.73%
- 5Y*
- 15.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.84%
AKRE vs. QLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AKRE Akre Focus ETF | -16.27% | -3.24% |
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund | 12.12% | 1.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between AKRE and QLC is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AKRE vs. QLC — Risk / Return Rank
AKRE
QLC
AKRE vs. QLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Akre Focus ETF (AKRE) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AKRE | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.42 | 0.80 | -2.22 |
Drawdowns
AKRE vs. QLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AKRE drawdown since its inception was -24.18%, smaller than the maximum QLC drawdown of -35.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKRE and QLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AKRE | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.18% | -35.86% | +11.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.98% | -0.09% | -18.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.07% | -4.54% | -8.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.89% | — |
Volatility
AKRE vs. QLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AKRE | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.97% | 12.38% | +8.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 16.82% | +4.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 18.42% | +2.55% |
AKRE vs. QLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
AKRE has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than QLC's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
AKRE vs. QLC - Dividend Comparison
AKRE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AKRE Akre Focus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund | 0.87% | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.26% | 1.46% | 0.96% | 1.40% | 1.91% | 1.82% | 1.29% | 1.80% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AKRE and QLC have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QLC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QLC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for AKRE.
QLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for AKRE.
AKRE is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Akre Capital and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for AKRE and 0.25% for QLC.
Find the right allocation for AKRE and QLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer