PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AKRE vs. GARY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AKRE vs. GARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Akre Focus ETF (AKRE) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AKRE achieves a -15.83% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 32.07% return.


AKRE

1D
0.66%
1M
0.99%
6M
-16.35%
YTD
-15.83%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GARY

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.57%
6M
25.73%
YTD
32.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AKRE vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AKRE
Akre Focus ETF
-15.83%-0.03%
GARY
Mango Growth ETF
32.07%0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between AKRE and GARY is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AKRE vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Akre Focus ETF (AKRE) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AKRE vs. GARY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AKRE vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AKRE drawdown since its inception was -24.18%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKRE and GARY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AKREGARYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.18%

-10.28%

-13.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.55%

-3.75%

-14.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.92%

-1.84%

-12.08%

Volatility

AKRE vs. GARY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AKREGARYDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.73%

21.79%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.73%

21.79%

-1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

21.79%

-1.06%

AKRE vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AKRE has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

AKRE vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison

AKRE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.


PositionTTM2025
AKRE
Akre Focus ETF
0.00%0.00%
GARY
Mango Growth ETF
0.04%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


AKRE and GARY have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GARY is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GARY is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for AKRE.

GARY has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for AKRE.

They also come from different issuers: Akre Capital and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for AKRE and 0.77% for GARY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AKRE and GARY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer