AKAM vs. CHAT
AKAM (Akamai Technologies, Inc.) is a stock, while CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, AKAM returned 10.47%/yr vs 51.00%/yr for CHAT. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AKAM vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AKAM achieves a 36.94% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 62.42% return.
AKAM
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -18.85%
- YTD
- 36.94%
- 6M
- 34.52%
- 1Y
- 49.24%
- 3Y*
- 10.47%
- 5Y*
- 0.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
CHAT
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- 62.42%
- 6M
- 61.25%
- 1Y
- 107.18%
- 3Y*
- 51.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AKAM vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AKAM Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 36.94% | -8.78% | -19.18% | 36.40% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 62.42% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 21.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between AKAM and CHAT is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023 | 0.40 |
The correlation between AKAM and CHAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AKAM vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
AKAM
CHAT
AKAM vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AKAM | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.47 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 6.62 | -4.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.76 | 18.29 | -12.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AKAM vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AKAM drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKAM and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AKAM | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.80% | -31.34% | -68.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.85% | -16.28% | -9.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.84% | -31.34% | -15.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.53% | -7.99% | -55.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.57% | -5.39% | -77.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.58% | 5.88% | +2.70% |
Volatility
AKAM vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) is 13.59%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 19.26%. This indicates that AKAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AKAM | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.59% | 19.26% | -5.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.30% | 29.49% | +18.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.44% | 34.88% | +19.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.71% | 31.21% | +5.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.42% | 31.21% | +3.21% |
Dividends
AKAM vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
AKAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AKAM Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.76% | 2.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AKAM and CHAT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHAT has higher volatility (19.26%) compared to AKAM (13.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AKAM dropped -99.80% vs CHAT's -31.34%.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AKAM and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer