AKAF vs. WLDR
AKAF (The Frontier Economic Fund) and WLDR (Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds - AKAF tracks the Alaska Last Frontier Index while WLDR tracks the Thomson Reuters StarMine Affinity World Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AKAF returned 27.47% vs 57.08% for WLDR. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AKAF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for WLDR.
Performance
AKAF vs. WLDR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AKAF achieves a 8.79% return, which is significantly lower than WLDR's 32.24% return.
AKAF
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- YTD
- 8.79%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WLDR
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- 5.84%
- YTD
- 32.24%
- 6M
- 31.44%
- 1Y
- 57.08%
- 3Y*
- 32.50%
- 5Y*
- 18.98%
- 10Y*
- —
AKAF vs. WLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AKAF The Frontier Economic Fund | 8.79% | 17.17% |
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF | 32.24% | 18.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between AKAF and WLDR is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AKAF vs. WLDR — Risk / Return Rank
AKAF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WLDR
AKAF vs. WLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Frontier Economic Fund (AKAF) and Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AKAF | WLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.59 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 25.07 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AKAF vs. WLDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AKAF drawdown since its inception was -9.32%, smaller than the maximum WLDR drawdown of -44.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKAF and WLDR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AKAF | WLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.32% | -44.69% | +35.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -8.86% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.18% | -0.49% | -3.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -8.58% | +6.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.28% | — |
Volatility
AKAF vs. WLDR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AKAF | WLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.01% | 16.27% | -1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 17.41% | -2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 21.00% | -5.99% |
AKAF vs. WLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AKAF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than WLDR's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
AKAF vs. WLDR - Dividend Comparison
AKAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than WLDR's 7.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AKAF The Frontier Economic Fund | 3.03% | 2.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF | 7.03% | 9.01% | 13.99% | 2.28% | 2.10% | 7.55% | 1.80% | 2.48% | 2.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AKAF and WLDR have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, WLDR leads with 57.08% vs 27.47% for AKAF. On fees, AKAF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WLDR has performed better with a 57.08% return vs 27.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AKAF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for WLDR.
WLDR has the higher dividend yield at 7.03%, compared with 3.03% for AKAF.
AKAF tracks Alaska Last Frontier Index, while WLDR tracks Thomson Reuters StarMine Affinity World Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Prospr Aligned and Regents Park Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AKAF and 0.67% for WLDR.
Find the right allocation for AKAF and WLDR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer