AKAF vs. FWD
AKAF (The Frontier Economic Fund) and FWD (AB Disruptors ETF) are both Global Equities funds. AKAF is passively managed, while FWD is actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AKAF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FWD.
Performance
AKAF vs. FWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AKAF achieves a 13.11% return, which is significantly lower than FWD's 38.47% return.
AKAF
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 13.11%
- 6M
- 14.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FWD
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 10.81%
- YTD
- 38.47%
- 6M
- 37.27%
- 1Y
- 72.96%
- 3Y*
- 38.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AKAF vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AKAF The Frontier Economic Fund | 13.11% | 16.79% |
FWD AB Disruptors ETF | 38.47% | 17.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between AKAF and FWD is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AKAF vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank
AKAF
FWD
AKAF vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Frontier Economic Fund (AKAF) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AKAF | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.36 | 1.65 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
AKAF vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AKAF drawdown since its inception was -9.32%, smaller than the maximum FWD drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKAF and FWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AKAF | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.32% | -29.02% | +19.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -1.44% | +1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.62% | -4.06% | +2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.66% | — |
Volatility
AKAF vs. FWD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AKAF | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.68% | 24.18% | -9.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.68% | 24.72% | -10.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.68% | 24.72% | -10.04% |
AKAF vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AKAF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
AKAF vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison
AKAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than FWD's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AKAF The Frontier Economic Fund | 2.08% | 2.25% | 0.00% |
FWD AB Disruptors ETF | 0.08% | 0.11% | 1.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AKAF and FWD have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AKAF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AKAF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FWD.
AKAF has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.08% for FWD.
They also come from different issuers: Prospr Aligned and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AKAF and 0.65% for FWD.
Find the right allocation for AKAF and FWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer