AKAF vs. ACWV
AKAF (The Frontier Economic Fund) and ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Global Equities funds - AKAF tracks the Alaska Last Frontier Index while ACWV tracks the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AKAF returned 27.73% vs 9.16% for ACWV. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
AKAF vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AKAF achieves a 11.02% return, which is significantly higher than ACWV's 5.75% return.
AKAF
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 3.83%
- YTD
- 11.02%
- 1Y
- 27.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 27.22%
ACWV
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 5.75%
- 1Y
- 9.16%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.13M | $11.24M | $12.40M | |
| $569.72 | $1.23K | $1.59K |
AKAF vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AKAF The Frontier Economic Fund | 11.02% | 17.17% |
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 5.75% | 2.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between AKAF and ACWV is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.61 |
The correlation between AKAF and ACWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AKAF vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank
AKAF
ACWV
AKAF vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Frontier Economic Fund (AKAF) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AKAF | ACWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.21 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 1.45 | +1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.74 | 4.10 | +5.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AKAF vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AKAF drawdown since its inception was -9.32%, smaller than the maximum ACWV drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKAF and ACWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AKAF | ACWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.32% | -28.82% | +19.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -6.37% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | -0.36% | -1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -3.10% | +1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 2.24% | +0.51% |
Volatility
AKAF vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison
The Frontier Economic Fund (AKAF) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) at 2.56%. This indicates that AKAF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AKAF | ACWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 2.56% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.53% | 6.41% | +5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.89% | 8.08% | +6.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.60% | 10.30% | +4.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.60% | 12.30% | +2.30% |
AKAF vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AKAF and ACWV have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AKAF vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison
AKAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than ACWV's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.90% | 2.09% | 2.33% | 2.41% | 2.18% | 1.92% | 1.77% | 2.54% | 2.32% | 2.04% | 2.56% | 2.28% |
AKAF The Frontier Economic Fund | 2.97% | 2.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AKAF and ACWV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AKAF has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to ACWV (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AKAF dropped -9.32% vs ACWV's -28.82%.
On 1-year performance, AKAF leads with 27.73% vs 9.16% for ACWV. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, ACWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AKAF has performed better with a 27.73% return vs 9.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AKAF and ACWV have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
AKAF has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 1.90% for ACWV.
AKAF tracks Alaska Last Frontier Index, while ACWV tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Vident and iShares.
AKAF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AKAF and ACWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer