PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AJAN vs. JPST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AJAN vs. JPST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AJAN achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly higher than JPST's 1.38% return.


AJAN

1D
0.09%
1M
0.58%
YTD
2.03%
6M
2.43%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JPST

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.38%
6M
1.70%
1Y
4.23%
3Y*
5.15%
5Y*
3.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AJAN vs. JPST - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AJAN and JPST is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2024

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AJAN vs. JPST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AJAN
AJAN Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

JPST
JPST Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
JPST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPST Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JPST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPST Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AJAN vs. JPST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AJANJPSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-13.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

3.85

-2.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

28.60

-25.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.81

143.05

-129.25

AJAN vs. JPST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is lower than the JPST Sharpe Ratio of 7.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AJAN and JPST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AJANJPSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

7.95

-5.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

6.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.74

3.20

-1.46

Drawdowns

AJAN vs. JPST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AJAN drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, which is greater than JPST's maximum drawdown of -3.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AJAN and JPST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AJANJPSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-3.28%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.24%

-0.15%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.04%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.29%

-0.08%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

0.03%

+0.41%

Volatility

AJAN vs. JPST - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) has a higher volatility of 0.65% compared to JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) at 0.15%. This indicates that AJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AJANJPSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

0.15%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.05%

0.36%

+1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36%

0.54%

+1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.80%

0.58%

+3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.80%

0.93%

+2.87%

AJAN vs. JPST - Expense Ratio Comparison

AJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JPST's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

AJAN vs. JPST - Dividend Comparison

AJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JPST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AJAN
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
4.26%4.43%5.16%4.79%1.83%0.73%1.43%2.69%2.07%0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


AJAN and JPST have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AJAN has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to JPST (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AJAN dropped -4.11% vs JPST's -3.28%.

On 1-year performance, AJAN leads with 6.13% vs 4.23% for JPST. On fees, JPST is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JPST has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AJAN has performed better with a 6.13% return vs 4.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPST is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for AJAN.

JPST has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 0.00% for AJAN.

AJAN is categorized as Options Trading, while JPST is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for AJAN and 0.18% for JPST.

JPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.95 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AJAN and JPST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer