PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIVL vs. DXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIVL vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVL achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly lower than DXJ's 20.35% return. Over the past 10 years, AIVL has underperformed DXJ with an annualized return of 8.24%, while DXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.20% annualized return.


AIVL

1D
0.01%
1M
2.83%
YTD
10.60%
6M
11.55%
1Y
16.62%
3Y*
14.47%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
8.24%

DXJ

1D
0.59%
1M
6.44%
YTD
20.35%
6M
23.80%
1Y
56.31%
3Y*
33.61%
5Y*
26.28%
10Y*
18.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIVL vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
10.60%9.72%13.49%7.17%-7.26%24.30%-5.82%24.40%-9.57%13.77%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
20.35%32.78%29.83%42.04%5.96%17.99%3.94%18.94%-19.78%22.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVL and DXJ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2006

0.59

The correlation between AIVL and DXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AIVL vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIVL
DXJ

Financial Services

18.2%
18.3%

Technology

17.9%
12.9%

Industrials

15.8%
27.4%

Healthcare

13.2%
6.8%

Utilities

9.3%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

8.9%
4.7%

Basic Materials

5.7%
8.5%

Communication Services

4.3%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
15.6%

Energy

2.4%
1.7%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Financial Services

AIVL
18.2%
DXJ
18.3%

Technology

AIVL
17.9%
DXJ
12.9%

Industrials

AIVL
15.8%
DXJ
27.4%

Healthcare

AIVL
13.2%
DXJ
6.8%

Utilities

AIVL
9.3%
DXJ
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

AIVL
8.9%
DXJ
4.7%

Basic Materials

AIVL
5.7%
DXJ
8.5%

Communication Services

AIVL
4.3%
DXJ
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

AIVL
3.5%
DXJ
15.6%

Energy

AIVL
2.4%
DXJ
1.7%

Real Estate

AIVL
0.9%
DXJ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIVL vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIVL
AIVL Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
AIVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVL Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVL Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

DXJ
DXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIVL vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIVLDXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.59

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

5.15

-3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.60

20.14

-11.54

AIVL vs. DXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVL Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the DXJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVL and DXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIVLDXJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

3.25

-1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

1.39

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.90

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.43

-0.01

Drawdowns

AIVL vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVL drawdown since its inception was -62.48%, which is greater than DXJ's maximum drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVL and DXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIVLDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.48%

-49.63%

-12.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

-10.98%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

-22.19%

+7.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.08%

-22.19%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.16%

-39.14%

-2.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

0.00%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.91%

-14.34%

+6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.80%

-0.86%

Volatility

AIVL vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) is 2.98%, while WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that AIVL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIVLDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

3.40%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.62%

13.10%

-4.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

17.44%

-6.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.72%

18.96%

-4.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

20.18%

-2.84%

AIVL vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVL has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIVL vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison

AIVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than DXJ's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
1.45%1.61%2.13%2.43%2.08%2.75%3.55%3.25%4.18%3.16%3.20%3.41%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
1.07%1.29%3.48%3.44%3.02%2.64%2.53%2.47%2.92%2.30%1.98%5.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIVL and DXJ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DXJ has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to AIVL (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVL dropped -62.48% vs DXJ's -49.63%.

On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 18.20% vs 8.24% for AIVL. On fees, AIVL is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, AIVL has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 18.20% return vs 8.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIVL is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.

AIVL has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.07% for DXJ.

AIVL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while DXJ is Japan Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for AIVL and 0.48% for DXJ.

DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIVL and DXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer