PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIVL vs. DHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIVL vs. DHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AIVL having a 10.60% return and DHS slightly higher at 11.10%. Over the past 10 years, AIVL has underperformed DHS with an annualized return of 8.24%, while DHS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.55% annualized return.


AIVL

1D
0.01%
1M
2.83%
YTD
10.60%
6M
11.55%
1Y
16.62%
3Y*
14.47%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
8.24%

DHS

1D
1.10%
1M
0.51%
YTD
11.10%
6M
11.95%
1Y
22.85%
3Y*
17.04%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
9.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIVL vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
10.60%9.72%13.49%7.17%-7.26%24.30%-5.82%24.40%-9.57%13.77%
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
11.10%12.87%18.02%-0.19%7.97%23.20%-5.70%22.59%-7.41%11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVL and DHS is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2006

0.92

The correlation between AIVL and DHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AIVL vs. DHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIVL
DHS

Financial Services

18.2%
22.3%

Technology

17.9%
3.7%

Industrials

15.8%
4.1%

Healthcare

13.2%
14.5%

Utilities

9.3%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.9%
18.7%

Basic Materials

5.7%
1.2%

Communication Services

4.3%
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
5.0%

Energy

2.4%
9.4%

Real Estate

0.9%
2.8%

Financial Services

AIVL
18.2%
DHS
22.3%

Technology

AIVL
17.9%
DHS
3.7%

Industrials

AIVL
15.8%
DHS
4.1%

Healthcare

AIVL
13.2%
DHS
14.5%

Utilities

AIVL
9.3%
DHS
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

AIVL
8.9%
DHS
18.7%

Basic Materials

AIVL
5.7%
DHS
1.2%

Communication Services

AIVL
4.3%
DHS
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

AIVL
3.5%
DHS
5.0%

Energy

AIVL
2.4%
DHS
9.4%

Real Estate

AIVL
0.9%
DHS
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIVL vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIVL
AIVL Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
AIVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVL Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVL Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

DHS
DHS Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIVL vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIVLDHSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.40

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

3.64

-1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.60

13.37

-4.77

AIVL vs. DHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVL Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the DHS Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVL and DHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIVLDHSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

2.29

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.78

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.60

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.41

+0.01

Drawdowns

AIVL vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVL drawdown since its inception was -62.48%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVL and DHS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIVLDHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.48%

-67.25%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

-6.30%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

-11.87%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.08%

-15.28%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.16%

-37.35%

-3.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-1.52%

+1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.91%

-9.55%

+1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.71%

+0.23%

Volatility

AIVL vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) have volatilities of 2.98% and 3.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIVLDHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

3.05%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.62%

7.36%

+1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

10.06%

+1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.72%

13.90%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

16.08%

+1.26%

AIVL vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AIVL and DHS have an expense ratio of 0.38%.


Dividends

AIVL vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison

AIVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than DHS's 3.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
1.45%1.61%2.13%2.43%2.08%2.75%3.55%3.25%4.18%3.16%3.20%3.41%
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
3.32%3.32%3.66%4.31%3.42%3.29%4.14%3.69%3.76%3.00%3.25%3.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIVL and DHS have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHS has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to AIVL (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVL dropped -62.48% vs DHS's -67.25%.

On 10-year performance, DHS leads with 9.55% vs 8.24% for AIVL. Both ETFs have the same 0.38% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DHS has performed better with a 9.55% return vs 8.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIVL and DHS have the same expense ratio: 0.38% per year.

DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 1.45% for AIVL.

AIVL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities.

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIVL and DHS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer