PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIVC vs. IGPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIVC vs. IGPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVC achieves a 79.45% return, which is significantly higher than IGPT's 72.49% return. Over the past 10 years, AIVC has underperformed IGPT with an annualized return of 17.12%, while IGPT has yielded a comparatively higher 22.30% annualized return.


AIVC

1D
-1.33%
1M
30.74%
YTD
79.45%
6M
79.35%
1Y
151.70%
3Y*
51.42%
5Y*
20.46%
10Y*
17.12%

IGPT

1D
0.39%
1M
28.39%
YTD
72.49%
6M
75.56%
1Y
123.95%
3Y*
43.05%
5Y*
15.89%
10Y*
22.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIVC vs. IGPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
79.45%39.94%18.22%39.28%-38.91%-7.23%41.45%27.78%-18.62%35.42%
IGPT
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF
72.49%31.55%17.15%27.29%-27.73%-11.79%54.31%35.06%16.38%34.60%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVC and IGPT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2016

0.78

The correlation between AIVC and IGPT shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AIVC vs. IGPT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIVC
IGPT

Technology

91.2%
73.9%

Communication Services

4.6%
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%

-

Financial Services

0.8%
1.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

3.6%

Industrials

-

3.1%

Real Estate

-

3.9%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AIVC
91.2%
IGPT
73.9%

Communication Services

AIVC
4.6%
IGPT
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

AIVC
4.2%
IGPT

-

Financial Services

AIVC
0.8%
IGPT
1.3%

Basic Materials

AIVC

-

IGPT

-

Consumer Defensive

AIVC

-

IGPT

-

Energy

AIVC

-

IGPT

-

Healthcare

AIVC

-

IGPT
3.6%

Industrials

AIVC

-

IGPT
3.1%

Real Estate

AIVC

-

IGPT
3.9%

Utilities

AIVC

-

IGPT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIVC vs. IGPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIVC
AIVC Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AIVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVC Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVC Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

IGPT
IGPT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
IGPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGPT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IGPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGPT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIVC vs. IGPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIVCIGPTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.14

4.39

+0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.21

4.95

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.67

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

10.82

7.47

+3.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

36.63

29.16

+7.47

AIVC vs. IGPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVC Sharpe Ratio is 5.14, which is comparable to the IGPT Sharpe Ratio of 4.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVC and IGPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIVCIGPTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.14

4.39

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.58

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.85

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.63

+0.01

Drawdowns

AIVC vs. IGPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVC drawdown since its inception was -56.11%, which is greater than IGPT's maximum drawdown of -50.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVC and IGPT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIVCIGPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.11%

-50.14%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.11%

-16.68%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.55%

-29.30%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.58%

-44.87%

-8.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.11%

-50.14%

-5.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

0.00%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.43%

-11.96%

-4.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

4.27%

-0.11%

Volatility

AIVC vs. IGPT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) is 11.07%, while Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) has a volatility of 12.51%. This indicates that AIVC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIVCIGPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.07%

12.51%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.72%

23.50%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.71%

28.42%

+1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.20%

27.66%

+2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.93%

26.33%

+0.60%

AIVC vs. IGPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than IGPT's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIVC vs. IGPT - Dividend Comparison

AIVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, more than IGPT's 0.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
0.10%0.17%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.39%1.16%0.38%0.92%0.64%0.00%
IGPT
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF
0.03%0.04%0.00%0.00%1.41%6.21%0.04%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, AIVC and IGPT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IGPT has higher volatility (12.51%) compared to AIVC (11.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVC dropped -56.11% vs IGPT's -50.14%.

On 10-year performance, IGPT leads with 22.30% vs 17.12% for AIVC. On fees, AIVC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, AIVC has been the lower-risk option at 11.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGPT has performed better with a 22.30% return vs 17.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIVC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IGPT.

AIVC has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.03% for IGPT.

AIVC tracks Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index, while IGPT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for AIVC and 0.60% for IGPT.

AIVC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.14 vs 4.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIVC and IGPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer