PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIVC vs. FTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIVC vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVC achieves a 56.92% return, which is significantly higher than FTEC's 22.53% return. Over the past 10 years, AIVC has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of 15.10%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 23.79% annualized return.


AIVC

1D
3.37%
1M
0.06%
6M
47.24%
YTD
56.92%
1Y
96.84%
3Y*
42.42%
5Y*
15.82%
10Y*
15.10%
ALL TIME*
15.34%

FTEC

1D
1.71%
1M
0.31%
6M
22.49%
YTD
22.53%
1Y
37.50%
3Y*
29.49%
5Y*
18.32%
10Y*
23.79%
ALL TIME*
21.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$721.94K$1.14M$2.79M
$86.23M$78.73M$94.95M

AIVC vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
56.92%39.94%18.22%39.28%-38.91%-7.23%41.45%27.78%-18.62%35.42%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
22.53%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%45.83%48.93%-0.39%36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVC and FTEC is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2016

0.76

The correlation between AIVC and FTEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AIVC vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIVC
FTEC

Technology

91.0%
98.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
0.1%

Communication Services

2.1%
0.5%

Industrials

1.7%
0.3%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.5%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AIVC
91.0%
FTEC
98.6%

Consumer Cyclical

AIVC
5.0%
FTEC
0.1%

Communication Services

AIVC
2.1%
FTEC
0.5%

Industrials

AIVC
1.7%
FTEC
0.3%

Financial Services

AIVC
0.0%
FTEC
0.5%

Basic Materials

AIVC

-

FTEC
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

AIVC

-

FTEC

-

Energy

AIVC

-

FTEC
0.3%

Healthcare

AIVC

-

FTEC

-

Real Estate

AIVC

-

FTEC

-

Utilities

AIVC

-

FTEC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIVC vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIVC
AIVC Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AIVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVC Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIVC vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIVCFTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.26

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

2.32

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.70

6.23

+8.47

AIVC vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVC Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVC and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIVC vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVC drawdown since its inception was -56.11%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVC and FTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIVCFTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.11%

-34.95%

-21.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.29%

-16.26%

-7.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.55%

-27.30%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.58%

-34.95%

-18.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.11%

-34.95%

-21.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.72%

-8.48%

-5.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.35%

-5.59%

-10.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.61%

6.04%

+0.57%

Volatility

AIVC vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) has a higher volatility of 13.60% compared to Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) at 8.41%. This indicates that AIVC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIVCFTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.60%

8.41%

+5.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.91%

20.16%

+9.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.27%

24.30%

+10.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.40%

25.89%

+5.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.52%

24.99%

+2.53%

AIVC vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIVC vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

AIVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than FTEC's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
0.11%0.17%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.39%1.16%0.38%0.92%0.64%0.00%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.36%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, AIVC and FTEC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AIVC has higher volatility (13.60%) compared to FTEC (8.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVC dropped -56.11% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

On 10-year performance, FTEC leads with 23.79% vs 15.10% for AIVC. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FTEC has been the lower-risk option at 8.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 23.79% return vs 15.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for AIVC.

FTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.11% for AIVC.

AIVC tracks Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for AIVC and 0.08% for FTEC.

AIVC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIVC and FTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer