AIUP vs. CNAV

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

AIUP (FINQ FIRST U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AIUP charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.

Performance

AIUP vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FINQ FIRST U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF (AIUP) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AIUP

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 0.17%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CNAV

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: -12.87%
• 6M: 19.62%
• YTD: 25.32%
• 1Y: 38.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 27.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AIUP FINQ FIRST U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF	$29.32K	$20.65K	$44.48K
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	$335.64K	$407.25K	$340.59K

AIUP vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AIUP FINQ FIRST U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF	7.57%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	21.59%

Correlation

The correlation between AIUP and CNAV is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2026	0.13

Return for Risk

AIUP vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIUP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CNAV

CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 53
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIUP vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FINQ FIRST U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF (AIUP) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIUP	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.17	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.64	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.22	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.98	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.69	—

Drawdowns

AIUP vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIUP drawdown since its inception was -11.32%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIUP and CNAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIUP	CNAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.32%	-30.06%	+18.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.15%	-19.64%	+12.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-5.69%	+2.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.05%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AIUP	CNAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	16.06%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	30.36%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.57%	33.19%	-9.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.57%	30.88%	-7.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.57%	30.88%	-7.31%

AIUP vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIUP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIUP vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIUP nor CNAV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIUP and CNAV in my portfolio?

AIUP and CNAV have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AIUP or CNAV?

On fees, AIUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIUP or CNAV?

AIUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIUP or CNAV?

AIUP and CNAV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AIUP and CNAV?

They also come from different issuers: FINQ and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for AIUP and 1.31% for CNAV.