AIUP vs. BBUS

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

AIUP (FINQ FIRST U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF) and BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. AIUP is actively managed, while BBUS is passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIUP charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.

Performance

AIUP vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FINQ FIRST U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF (AIUP) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AIUP

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 2.91%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBUS

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 1.55%
• 6M: 8.32%
• YTD: 9.88%
• 1Y: 21.21%
• 3Y*: 21.04%
• 5Y*: 12.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIUP vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AIUP FINQ FIRST U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF	13.23%
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF	10.96%

Correlation

The correlation between AIUP and BBUS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2026	0.61

Return for Risk

AIUP vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIUP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BBUS

BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 61
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIUP vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FINQ FIRST U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF (AIUP) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIUP	BBUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.70	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.34	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.31	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.99	—

Drawdowns

AIUP vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIUP drawdown since its inception was -11.32%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIUP and BBUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIUP	BBUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.32%	-35.35%	+24.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.21%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.88%	-1.39%	-0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.03%	-5.42%	+2.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.13%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AIUP	BBUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.11%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.98%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.83%	12.56%	+11.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.83%	17.15%	+6.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.83%	19.56%	+4.27%

AIUP vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIUP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIUP vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

AIUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AIUP FINQ FIRST U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF	1.01%	1.07%	1.21%	1.38%	1.57%	1.11%	1.43%	1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIUP and BBUS in my portfolio?

AIUP and BBUS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AIUP or BBUS?

On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIUP or BBUS?

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AIUP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIUP or BBUS?

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for AIUP.

What is the main difference between AIUP and BBUS?

They also come from different issuers: FINQ and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for AIUP and 0.02% for BBUS.