AITFX vs. BMNSX
AITFX (Invesco Limited Term Municipal Income Fund) and BMNSX (Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, AITFX returned 2.08%/yr vs 2.18%/yr for BMNSX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AITFX charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for BMNSX.
Performance
AITFX vs. BMNSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AITFX achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than BMNSX's 1.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AITFX having a 2.08% annualized return and BMNSX not far ahead at 2.18%.
AITFX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 1.34%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.08%
BMNSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 5.45%
- 3Y*
- 3.87%
- 5Y*
- 1.48%
- 10Y*
- 2.18%
AITFX vs. BMNSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AITFX Invesco Limited Term Municipal Income Fund | 1.34% | 5.47% | 2.88% | 3.67% | -2.62% | 0.57% | 3.73% | 4.35% | 1.13% | 2.69% |
BMNSX Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund | 1.45% | 4.63% | 2.26% | 5.28% | -6.40% | 1.44% | 5.02% | 6.40% | 1.05% | 5.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between AITFX and BMNSX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2015 | 0.71 |
The correlation between AITFX and BMNSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AITFX vs. BMNSX — Risk / Return Rank
AITFX
BMNSX
AITFX vs. BMNSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Limited Term Municipal Income Fund (AITFX) and Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMNSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AITFX | BMNSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.98 | 1.89 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 2.66 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.42 | 9.23 | +2.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AITFX vs. BMNSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AITFX drawdown since its inception was -7.17%, smaller than the maximum BMNSX drawdown of -10.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AITFX and BMNSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AITFX | BMNSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.17% | -10.24% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.62% | -2.09% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.63% | -3.67% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.62% | -10.24% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.17% | -10.24% | +3.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -0.31% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.73% | -1.65% | +0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.43% | 0.60% | -0.17% |
Volatility
AITFX vs. BMNSX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Limited Term Municipal Income Fund (AITFX) has a higher volatility of 0.49% compared to Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMNSX) at 0.43%. This indicates that AITFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMNSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AITFX | BMNSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.49% | 0.43% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.28% | 1.34% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64% | 1.68% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.09% | 2.69% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.19% | 3.01% | -0.82% |
AITFX vs. BMNSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AITFX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than BMNSX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
AITFX vs. BMNSX - Dividend Comparison
AITFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than BMNSX's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AITFX Invesco Limited Term Municipal Income Fund | 3.63% | 4.82% | 3.93% | 2.67% | 1.80% | 1.44% | 2.07% | 2.48% | 2.28% | 1.95% | 1.93% | 2.51% |
BMNSX Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund | 3.24% | 3.22% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 1.67% | 1.34% | 1.99% | 2.15% | 2.01% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AITFX and BMNSX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AITFX has higher volatility (0.49%) compared to BMNSX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AITFX dropped -7.17% vs BMNSX's -10.24%.
BMNSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 2.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AITFX and BMNSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer