PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIT vs. PH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AIT vs. PH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIT achieves a 22.87% return, which is significantly higher than PH's 0.89% return. Over the past 10 years, AIT has underperformed PH with an annualized return of 22.87%, while PH has yielded a comparatively higher 24.75% annualized return.


AIT

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.96%
YTD
22.87%
6M
22.65%
1Y
36.57%
3Y*
33.63%
5Y*
28.07%
10Y*
22.87%

PH

1D
0.09%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.89%
6M
0.81%
1Y
32.71%
3Y*
36.81%
5Y*
25.26%
10Y*
24.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIT vs. PH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIT
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc.
22.87%8.01%39.67%38.35%24.25%33.57%19.37%26.35%-19.41%16.89%
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
0.89%39.54%39.58%60.81%-6.91%18.30%34.78%40.75%-24.00%44.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AIT and PH is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 1985

0.41

Over the past year, AIT and PH have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AIT:

$11.95B

PH:

$113.04B

EPS

AIT:

$10.56

PH:

$27.11

PE Ratio

AIT:

29.78

PH:

32.58

PEG Ratio

AIT:

0.93

PH:

1.37

PS Ratio

AIT:

2.48

PH:

5.40

PB Ratio

AIT:

4.00

PH:

7.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

AIT:

$4.84B

PH:

$20.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AIT:

$1.47B

PH:

$7.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

AIT:

$563.38M

PH:

$5.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIT vs. PH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIT
AIT Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIT Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
AIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PH
PH Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PH Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
PH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PH Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIT vs. PH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AITPHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.24

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

1.70

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.86

5.17

+1.68

AIT vs. PH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the PH Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIT and PH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AITPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.34

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.89

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.78

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.44

-0.01

Drawdowns

AIT vs. PH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIT drawdown since its inception was -66.47%, roughly equal to the maximum PH drawdown of -66.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIT and PH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AITPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.47%

-66.92%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-19.34%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.42%

-26.79%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.42%

-28.64%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.29%

-54.68%

-4.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-13.48%

+13.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.04%

-15.33%

-2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.35%

6.34%

-0.99%

Volatility

AIT vs. PH - Volatility Comparison

Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) have volatilities of 5.61% and 5.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AITPHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

5.59%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.07%

18.60%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.31%

24.62%

+1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.49%

28.61%

+1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.29%

31.69%

+1.60%

Dividends

AIT vs. PH - Dividend Comparison

AIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than PH's 0.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIT
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc.
0.62%0.72%0.62%0.81%1.08%1.29%1.64%1.86%2.22%1.70%1.89%2.67%
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
0.84%0.80%1.00%1.25%1.73%1.25%1.29%1.65%1.97%1.32%1.80%2.60%

Financials

AIT vs. PH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. and Parker-Hannifin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
1.25B
5.49B
(AIT) Total Revenue
(PH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AIT vs. PH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. and Parker-Hannifin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

28.0%30.0%32.0%34.0%36.0%38.0%20222023202420252026
31.8%
36.8%
Portfolio components
AIT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 397.52M and revenue of 1.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.8%.

PH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 5.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

AIT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 137.93M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.

PH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.

AIT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 99.77M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.

PH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 904.00M and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AIT and PH have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIT has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to PH (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIT dropped -66.47% vs PH's -66.92%.

AIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIT and PH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer