AIS vs. ROBT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) and ROBT (First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds. AIS is actively managed, while ROBT is passively managed. Over the past year, AIS returned 119.85% vs 12.26% for ROBT. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AIS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ROBT.

Performance

AIS vs. ROBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIS achieves a 68.71% return, which is significantly higher than ROBT's 6.10% return.

AIS

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: -14.16%
• 6M: 49.61%
• YTD: 68.71%
• 1Y: 119.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 75.75%

ROBT

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: -2.19%
• 6M: 6.05%
• YTD: 6.10%
• 1Y: 12.26%
• 3Y*: 6.14%
• 5Y*: 0.69%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	$37.93M	$45.10M	$51.04M
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF	$2.54M	$2.27M	$2.92M

AIS vs. ROBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	68.71%	58.35%	-4.74%
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF	6.10%	15.16%	-3.76%

Correlation

The correlation between AIS and ROBT is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024	0.75

The correlation between AIS and ROBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIS vs. ROBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIS	ROBT
Technology	87.2%	53.3%
Industrials	6.8%	23.1%
Utilities	2.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.3%	1.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	3.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.6%
Energy	-	1.6%
Healthcare	-	8.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Financial Services	-0.0%	1.6%

Return for Risk

AIS vs. ROBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIS

AIS Risk / Return Rank: 87
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 85
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

ROBT

ROBT Risk / Return Rank: 20
ROBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
ROBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
ROBT Omega Ratio Rank: 20
ROBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
ROBT Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIS vs. ROBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIS	ROBT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	0.41	+2.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	0.72	+2.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.08	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	0.47	+2.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.91	1.23	+12.68

AIS vs. ROBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIS Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the ROBT Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIS and ROBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AIS vs. ROBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIS drawdown since its inception was -34.44%, smaller than the maximum ROBT drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIS and ROBT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIS	ROBT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.44%	-44.47%	+10.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.44%	-21.66%	-12.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.68%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.93%	-8.70%	-19.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.30%	-15.83%	+9.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.28%	8.29%	-0.01%

Volatility

AIS vs. ROBT - Volatility Comparison

VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) has a higher volatility of 21.48% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) at 5.83%. This indicates that AIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIS	ROBT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.48%	5.83%	+15.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.19%	19.41%	+23.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.78%	24.93%	+22.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.01%	25.56%	+18.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.01%	25.53%	+18.48%

AIS vs. ROBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ROBT's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIS vs. ROBT - Dividend Comparison

AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF	0.02%	0.00%	0.68%	0.23%	0.35%	0.06%	0.17%	0.42%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIS and ROBT in my portfolio?

AIS and ROBT have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AIS or ROBT?

AIS has higher volatility (21.48%) compared to ROBT (5.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIS dropped -34.44% vs ROBT's -44.47%.

Which ETF is better, AIS or ROBT?

On 1-year performance, AIS leads with 119.85% vs 12.26% for ROBT. On fees, ROBT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ROBT has been the lower-risk option at 5.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AIS or ROBT?

Over the 1-year period, AIS has performed better with a 119.85% return vs 12.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIS or ROBT?

ROBT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIS or ROBT?

ROBT has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for AIS.

What is the main difference between AIS and ROBT?

They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIS and 0.65% for ROBT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.