AIS vs. DBMF

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by VistaShares, while DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AIS returned 186.31% vs 29.05% for DBMF. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.

Performance

AIS vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIS achieves a 96.00% return, which is significantly higher than DBMF's 10.45% return.

AIS

• 1D: 4.52%
• 1M: 9.45%
• YTD: 96.00%
• 6M: 93.95%
• 1Y: 186.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBMF

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 0.59%
• YTD: 10.45%
• 6M: 12.63%
• 1Y: 29.05%
• 3Y*: 10.02%
• 5Y*: 7.92%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIS vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	96.00%	58.35%	-4.92%
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	10.45%	13.85%	-1.09%

Correlation

The correlation between AIS and DBMF is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.34

AIS vs. DBMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIS	DBMF
Technology	84.6%	29.8%
Industrials	8.9%	8.4%
Utilities	3.2%	2.3%
Basic Materials	-	2.2%
Communication Services	-	8.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.1%
Energy	-	3.9%
Healthcare	-	12.7%
Real Estate	-	2.5%
Financial Services	-0.0%	12.5%

Return for Risk

AIS vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIS

AIS Risk / Return Rank: 96
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 95
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 84
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIS vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AIS	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.89	2.36	+2.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.56	3.08	+1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.66	1.50	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.84	4.78	+7.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	37.94	17.53	+20.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AIS vs. DBMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIS Sharpe Ratio is 4.89, which is higher than the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIS and DBMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIS	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.89	2.36	+2.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.70	0.75	+1.95

Drawdowns

AIS vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIS drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIS and DBMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIS	DBMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.78%	-20.39%	-12.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.84%	-6.10%	-9.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.34%	-1.75%	-8.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.48%	-6.58%	+1.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.93%	1.66%	+3.27%

Volatility

AIS vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) has a higher volatility of 20.87% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.94%. This indicates that AIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIS	DBMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.87%	2.94%	+17.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.10%	10.01%	+23.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.43%	12.38%	+26.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.39%	12.56%	+26.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.39%	12.43%	+26.96%

AIS vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIS vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.18%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIS and DBMF in my portfolio?

AIS and DBMF have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AIS or DBMF?

AIS has higher volatility (20.87%) compared to DBMF (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIS dropped -32.78% vs DBMF's -20.39%.

Which ETF is better, AIS or DBMF?

On 1-year performance, AIS leads with 186.31% vs 29.05% for DBMF. On fees, AIS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DBMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AIS or DBMF?

Over the 1-year period, AIS has performed better with a 186.31% return vs 29.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIS or DBMF?

AIS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIS or DBMF?

DBMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.18%, compared with 0.00% for AIS.

What is the main difference between AIS and DBMF?

AIS is categorized as Technology Equities, while DBMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and iM Global Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIS and 0.85% for DBMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.89 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.