PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIS vs. CHPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIS vs. CHPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIS achieves a 68.71% return, which is significantly higher than CHPX's 60.49% return.


AIS

1D
0.47%
1M
-14.16%
6M
49.61%
YTD
68.71%
1Y
119.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
75.75%

CHPX

1D
0.65%
1M
-8.69%
6M
45.81%
YTD
60.49%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$37.93M$45.10M$51.04M
$4.80M$5.31M$11.57M

AIS vs. CHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIS and CHPX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025

0.96

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIS vs. CHPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIS
AIS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIS vs. CHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AISCHPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.91

AIS vs. CHPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIS vs. CHPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIS drawdown since its inception was -34.44%, which is greater than CHPX's maximum drawdown of -27.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIS and CHPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AISCHPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.44%

-27.10%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.93%

-20.92%

-7.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.30%

-5.30%

-1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.28%

Volatility

AIS vs. CHPX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AISCHPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.78%

44.96%

+2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.01%

44.96%

-0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.01%

44.96%

-0.95%

AIS vs. CHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIS vs. CHPX - Dividend Comparison

AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, AIS and CHPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CHPX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CHPX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

CHPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for AIS.

They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIS and 0.50% for CHPX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIS and CHPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer