AIS vs. CHPX
AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) and CHPX (Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds. AIS is actively managed, while CHPX is passively managed. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. AIS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CHPX.
Performance
AIS vs. CHPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIS achieves a 68.71% return, which is significantly higher than CHPX's 60.49% return.
AIS
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -14.16%
- 6M
- 49.61%
- YTD
- 68.71%
- 1Y
- 119.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 75.75%
CHPX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -8.69%
- 6M
- 45.81%
- YTD
- 60.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.93M | $45.10M | $51.04M | |
| $4.80M | $5.31M | $11.57M |
AIS vs. CHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF | 68.71% | 7.52% |
CHPX Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF | 60.49% | 6.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIS and CHPX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIS vs. CHPX — Risk / Return Rank
AIS
CHPX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AIS vs. CHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIS | CHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.91 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIS vs. CHPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIS drawdown since its inception was -34.44%, which is greater than CHPX's maximum drawdown of -27.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIS and CHPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIS | CHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.44% | -27.10% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.93% | -20.92% | -7.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.30% | -5.30% | -1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.28% | — | — |
Volatility
AIS vs. CHPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIS | CHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.48% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.19% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.78% | 44.96% | +2.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.01% | 44.96% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.01% | 44.96% | -0.95% |
AIS vs. CHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIS vs. CHPX - Dividend Comparison
AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CHPX Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF | 0.04% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, AIS and CHPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CHPX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHPX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.
CHPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for AIS.
They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIS and 0.50% for CHPX.
Find the right allocation for AIS and CHPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer