AIS vs. CCNR

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) and CCNR (ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by VistaShares, while CCNR is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by ALPS. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AIS returned 213.16% vs 54.76% for CCNR. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for CCNR.

Performance

AIS vs. CCNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIS achieves a 115.20% return, which is significantly higher than CCNR's 21.64% return.

AIS

• 1D: 5.81%
• 1M: 19.85%
• YTD: 115.20%
• 6M: 124.34%
• 1Y: 213.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCNR

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -3.64%
• YTD: 21.64%
• 6M: 23.54%
• 1Y: 54.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIS vs. CCNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	115.20%	58.35%	-4.74%
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF	21.64%	46.48%	-6.56%

Correlation

The correlation between AIS and CCNR is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024	0.49

AIS vs. CCNR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIS	CCNR
Technology	88.4%	0.3%
Industrials	7.1%	7.3%
Utilities	2.6%	9.7%
Basic Materials	-	33.1%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Energy	-	41.2%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	0.5%
Financial Services	-0.0%	0.6%

Return for Risk

AIS vs. CCNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIS

AIS Risk / Return Rank: 97
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

CCNR

CCNR Risk / Return Rank: 91
CCNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CCNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
CCNR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
CCNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CCNR Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIS vs. CCNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIS	CCNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.40	2.95	+2.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.90	3.62	+1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.70	1.50	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	13.54	7.01	+6.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	41.86	24.58	+17.28

AIS vs. CCNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIS Sharpe Ratio is 5.40, which is higher than the CCNR Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIS and CCNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AIS vs. CCNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIS drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, which is greater than CCNR's maximum drawdown of -20.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIS and CCNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIS	CCNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.78%	-20.06%	-12.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.84%	-7.85%	-7.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-5.43%	+3.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.50%	-3.59%	-1.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.12%	2.23%	+2.89%

Volatility

AIS vs. CCNR - Volatility Comparison

VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) has a higher volatility of 21.41% compared to ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) at 6.77%. This indicates that AIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIS	CCNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.41%	6.77%	+14.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.58%	13.89%	+20.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.81%	18.68%	+21.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.05%	20.12%	+19.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.05%	20.12%	+19.93%

AIS vs. CCNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CCNR's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIS vs. CCNR - Dividend Comparison

AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF	2.86%	3.48%	1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIS and CCNR in my portfolio?

AIS and CCNR have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AIS or CCNR?

AIS has higher volatility (21.41%) compared to CCNR (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIS dropped -32.78% vs CCNR's -20.06%.

Which ETF is better, AIS or CCNR?

On 1-year performance, AIS leads with 213.16% vs 54.76% for CCNR. On fees, CCNR is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, CCNR has been the lower-risk option at 6.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AIS or CCNR?

Over the 1-year period, AIS has performed better with a 213.16% return vs 54.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIS or CCNR?

CCNR is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIS or CCNR?

CCNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.00% for AIS.

What is the main difference between AIS and CCNR?

AIS is categorized as Technology Equities, while CCNR is Natural Resources. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and ALPS. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIS and 0.39% for CCNR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.40 vs 2.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.