PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
AIS vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

AIS vs. BOTZ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds. AIS is actively managed, while BOTZ is passively managed. Over the past year, AIS returned 119.85% vs 6.85% for BOTZ. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AIS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.

Performance

AIS vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIS achieves a 68.71% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's -2.74% return.

AIS

1D
0.47%
1M
-14.16%
6M
49.61%
YTD
68.71%
1Y
119.85%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
75.75%

BOTZ

1D
0.92%
1M
-5.80%
6M
-5.58%
YTD
-2.74%
1Y
6.85%
3Y*
7.34%
5Y*
0.96%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
9.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

AIS

VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF
$37.93M$45.10M$51.04M

BOTZ

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
$28.68M$29.79M$37.55M

AIS vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
AIS
VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF		68.71%58.35%-4.74%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF		-2.74%14.17%-4.34%

Correlation

The correlation between AIS and BOTZ is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024

0.77

The correlation between AIS and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIS vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
AIS
BOTZ

Technology

87.2%
30.8%

Industrials

6.8%
50.8%

Utilities

2.9%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.2%

Energy

-

0.5%

Healthcare

-

8.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

-0.0%
0.9%

Technology

AIS
87.2%
BOTZ
30.8%

Industrials

AIS
6.8%
BOTZ
50.8%

Utilities

AIS
2.9%
BOTZ
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

AIS
0.3%
BOTZ
0.0%

Basic Materials

AIS

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Communication Services

AIS

-

BOTZ
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

AIS

-

BOTZ
6.2%

Energy

AIS

-

BOTZ
0.5%

Healthcare

AIS

-

BOTZ
8.0%

Real Estate

AIS

-

BOTZ

-

Financial Services

AIS
-0.0%
BOTZ
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF

Often compared with AIS:
AIS vs. SMHAIS vs. CHATAIS vs. DRAMAIS vs. AIPOAIS vs. BAIAIS vs. TCAIAIS vs. PSI
Often compared with BOTZ:
BOTZ vs. ROBOBOTZ vs. AIQBOTZ vs. ARKQBOTZ vs. IRBOBOTZ vs. ROBTBOTZ vs. SPYBOTZ vs. QQQ

Return for Risk

AIS vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
AIS
AIS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIS vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

AISBOTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.42
0.22

+2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.72
0.49

+2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.06

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

0.30

+3.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.91

0.76

+13.15

AIS vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIS Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIS and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIS vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIS drawdown since its inception was -34.44%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIS and BOTZ.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

AISBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.44%

-55.54%

+21.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.44%

-19.34%

-15.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-29.02%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-55.54%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.93%

-15.36%

-12.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.30%

-18.22%

+11.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.28%

7.59%

+0.69%

Volatility

AIS vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) has a higher volatility of 21.48% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 9.07%. This indicates that AIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

AISBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.48%

9.07%

+12.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.19%

21.63%

+21.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.78%

26.37%

+21.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.01%

27.27%

+16.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.01%

25.88%

+18.13%

AIS vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIS vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AIS
VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF		0.50%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

AIS and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIS has higher volatility (21.48%) compared to BOTZ (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIS dropped -34.44% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

On 1-year performance, AIS leads with 119.85% vs 6.85% for BOTZ. On fees, BOTZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 9.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIS has performed better with a 119.85% return vs 6.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BOTZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for AIS.

They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIS and 0.68% for BOTZ.

AIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIS and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer