PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIS vs. AVXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIS vs. AVXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIS achieves a 103.39% return, which is significantly higher than AVXC's 31.49% return.


AIS

1D
0.76%
1M
8.29%
YTD
103.39%
6M
110.47%
1Y
190.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVXC

1D
0.58%
1M
3.02%
YTD
31.49%
6M
35.68%
1Y
53.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIS vs. AVXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIS and AVXC is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024

0.79

The correlation between AIS and AVXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIS vs. AVXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIS
AVXC

Technology

84.6%
38.2%

Industrials

8.9%
10.0%

Utilities

3.2%
2.8%

Basic Materials

-

8.1%

Communication Services

-

3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.9%

Energy

-

4.9%

Healthcare

-

2.3%

Real Estate

-

1.5%

Financial Services

-0.0%
20.2%

Technology

AIS
84.6%
AVXC
38.2%

Industrials

AIS
8.9%
AVXC
10.0%

Utilities

AIS
3.2%
AVXC
2.8%

Basic Materials

AIS

-

AVXC
8.1%

Communication Services

AIS

-

AVXC
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

AIS

-

AVXC
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

AIS

-

AVXC
2.9%

Energy

AIS

-

AVXC
4.9%

Healthcare

AIS

-

AVXC
2.3%

Real Estate

AIS

-

AVXC
1.5%

Financial Services

AIS
-0.0%
AVXC
20.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIS vs. AVXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIS
AIS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

AVXC
AVXC Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AVXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVXC Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AVXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIS vs. AVXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AISAVXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.45

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.07

3.82

+8.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

37.31

14.82

+22.49

AIS vs. AVXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIS Sharpe Ratio is 4.85, which is higher than the AVXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIS and AVXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIS vs. AVXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIS drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, which is greater than AVXC's maximum drawdown of -20.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIS and AVXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AISAVXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.78%

-20.44%

-12.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.84%

-14.04%

-1.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.96%

-3.33%

-3.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-3.81%

-1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.12%

3.61%

+1.51%

Volatility

AIS vs. AVXC - Volatility Comparison

VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) has a higher volatility of 20.76% compared to Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) at 11.39%. This indicates that AIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AISAVXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.76%

11.39%

+9.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.25%

19.80%

+14.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.44%

21.88%

+17.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.86%

19.26%

+20.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.86%

19.26%

+20.60%

AIS vs. AVXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AVXC's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIS vs. AVXC - Dividend Comparison

AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AIS and AVXC have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIS has higher volatility (20.76%) compared to AVXC (11.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIS dropped -32.78% vs AVXC's -20.44%.

On 1-year performance, AIS leads with 190.00% vs 53.33% for AVXC. On fees, AVXC is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, AVXC has been the lower-risk option at 11.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIS has performed better with a 190.00% return vs 53.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVXC is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

AVXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 0.00% for AIS.

AIS is categorized as Technology Equities, while AVXC is Emerging Markets Diversified. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIS and 0.33% for AVXC.

AIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.85 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIS and AVXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer