AIRR vs. HRTS

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) and HRTS (Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index, while HRTS is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Tema. AIRR is passively managed, while HRTS is actively managed. Over the past year, AIRR returned 43.19% vs 27.95% for HRTS. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIRR charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HRTS.

Performance

AIRR vs. HRTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIRR achieves a 23.60% return, which is significantly higher than HRTS's 3.14% return.

AIRR

• 1D: -1.76%
• 1M: -6.18%
• 6M: 11.62%
• YTD: 23.60%
• 1Y: 43.19%
• 3Y*: 31.65%
• 5Y*: 25.07%
• 10Y*: 20.37%

HRTS

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 6.20%
• 6M: 0.85%
• YTD: 3.14%
• 1Y: 27.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIRR vs. HRTS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF	23.60%	27.92%	33.45%	13.46%
HRTS Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF	3.14%	23.93%	-4.30%	13.88%

Correlation

The correlation between AIRR and HRTS is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023	0.44

The correlation between AIRR and HRTS shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AIRR vs. HRTS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIRR	HRTS
Industrials	80.8%	-
Financial Services	9.6%	-
Energy	3.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.9%	-
Technology	0.7%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	100.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AIRR vs. HRTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIRR

AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 66
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 53
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 77

HRTS

HRTS Risk / Return Rank: 62
HRTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
HRTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
HRTS Omega Ratio Rank: 60
HRTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
HRTS Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIRR vs. HRTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIRR	HRTS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	1.70	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	2.58	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.29	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	2.55	+0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.47	6.14	+5.32

AIRR vs. HRTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIRR Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the HRTS Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIRR and HRTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AIRR vs. HRTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIRR drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, which is greater than HRTS's maximum drawdown of -25.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIRR and HRTS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIRR	HRTS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.37%	-25.81%	-16.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.09%	-11.01%	-2.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.86%	-3.11%	-5.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.45%	-8.81%	+1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.78%	4.56%	-0.78%

Volatility

AIRR vs. HRTS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a higher volatility of 9.25% compared to Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) at 5.20%. This indicates that AIRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HRTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIRR	HRTS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.25%	5.20%	+4.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.15%	12.07%	+9.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.11%	16.54%	+10.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.53%	19.10%	+6.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.35%	19.10%	+7.25%

AIRR vs. HRTS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIRR has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than HRTS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIRR vs. HRTS - Dividend Comparison

AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than HRTS's 1.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF	0.09%	0.19%	0.18%	0.23%	0.12%	0.05%	0.10%	0.20%	0.43%	0.30%	0.08%	0.47%
HRTS Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF	1.30%	1.34%	1.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIRR and HRTS in my portfolio?

AIRR and HRTS have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AIRR or HRTS?

AIRR has higher volatility (9.25%) compared to HRTS (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIRR dropped -42.37% vs HRTS's -25.81%.

Which ETF is better, AIRR or HRTS?

On 1-year performance, AIRR leads with 43.19% vs 27.95% for HRTS. On fees, AIRR is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, HRTS has been the lower-risk option at 5.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AIRR or HRTS?

Over the 1-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 43.19% return vs 27.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIRR or HRTS?

AIRR is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HRTS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIRR or HRTS?

HRTS has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.09% for AIRR.

What is the main difference between AIRR and HRTS?

AIRR is categorized as Building & Construction, while HRTS is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIRR and 0.75% for HRTS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HRTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.