AIRR vs. GARP
AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) and GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index, while GARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AIRR returned 25.46%/yr vs 18.96%/yr for GARP. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIRR charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GARP.
Performance
AIRR vs. GARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIRR achieves a 31.74% return, which is significantly higher than GARP's 16.96% return.
AIRR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 31.74%
- 6M
- 28.77%
- 1Y
- 65.25%
- 3Y*
- 35.29%
- 5Y*
- 25.46%
- 10Y*
- 22.05%
GARP
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- 16.96%
- 6M
- 17.70%
- 1Y
- 36.11%
- 3Y*
- 31.05%
- 5Y*
- 18.96%
- 10Y*
- —
AIRR vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 31.74% | 27.92% | 33.45% | 31.43% | -2.08% | 33.01% | 17.45% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 16.96% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIRR and GARP is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020 | 0.61 |
The correlation between AIRR and GARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
AIRR vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIRR
GARP
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
AIRR
GARP
Financial Services
AIRR
GARP
Energy
AIRR
GARP
Technology
AIRR
GARP
Basic Materials
AIRR
-
GARP
Communication Services
AIRR
-
GARP
Consumer Cyclical
AIRR
-
GARP
Consumer Defensive
AIRR
-
GARP
-
Healthcare
AIRR
-
GARP
Real Estate
AIRR
-
GARP
Utilities
AIRR
-
GARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIRR vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank
AIRR
GARP
AIRR vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIRR | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.33 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.01 | 2.65 | +2.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.33 | 10.37 | +7.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIRR vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIRR drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, which is greater than GARP's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIRR and GARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIRR | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.37% | -31.34% | -11.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.09% | -13.69% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.95% | -23.73% | -4.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.95% | -30.61% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -4.27% | +2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.48% | -7.35% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 3.49% | +0.08% |
Volatility
AIRR vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a higher volatility of 9.32% compared to iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) at 7.61%. This indicates that AIRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIRR | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.32% | 7.61% | +1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.81% | 15.12% | +5.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.19% | 18.79% | +7.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.45% | 22.11% | +3.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.36% | 23.95% | +2.41% |
AIRR vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIRR has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIRR vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison
AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than GARP's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 0.13% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.43% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.26% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIRR and GARP have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIRR has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to GARP (7.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIRR dropped -42.37% vs GARP's -31.34%.
On 5-year performance, AIRR leads with 25.46% vs 18.96% for GARP. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GARP has been the lower-risk option at 7.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 25.46% return vs 18.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIRR.
GARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.
AIRR is categorized as Building & Construction, while GARP is Large Cap Growth Equities. AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index, while GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIRR and 0.15% for GARP.
AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIRR and GARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer