AIRR vs. FBCG
AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) and FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index, while FBCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. AIRR is passively managed, while FBCG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, AIRR returned 25.46%/yr vs 14.46%/yr for FBCG. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIRR charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FBCG.
Performance
AIRR vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIRR achieves a 31.74% return, which is significantly higher than FBCG's 11.31% return.
AIRR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 31.74%
- 6M
- 28.77%
- 1Y
- 65.25%
- 3Y*
- 35.29%
- 5Y*
- 25.46%
- 10Y*
- 22.05%
FBCG
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 12.74%
- 1Y
- 32.07%
- 3Y*
- 28.04%
- 5Y*
- 14.46%
- 10Y*
- —
AIRR vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 31.74% | 27.92% | 33.45% | 31.43% | -2.08% | 33.01% | 38.86% |
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 11.31% | 18.60% | 39.05% | 57.98% | -39.10% | 21.34% | 41.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIRR and FBCG is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.60 |
The correlation between AIRR and FBCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
AIRR vs. FBCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIRR
FBCG
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
AIRR
FBCG
Financial Services
AIRR
FBCG
Energy
AIRR
FBCG
Technology
AIRR
FBCG
Basic Materials
AIRR
-
FBCG
Communication Services
AIRR
-
FBCG
Consumer Cyclical
AIRR
-
FBCG
Consumer Defensive
AIRR
-
FBCG
Healthcare
AIRR
-
FBCG
Real Estate
AIRR
-
FBCG
Utilities
AIRR
-
FBCG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIRR vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank
AIRR
FBCG
AIRR vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIRR | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.29 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.01 | 2.12 | +2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.33 | 8.07 | +10.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIRR vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIRR drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, roughly equal to the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIRR and FBCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIRR | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.37% | -43.56% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.09% | -15.17% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.95% | -27.89% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.95% | -43.56% | +15.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -4.71% | +2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.48% | -11.45% | +3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 3.99% | -0.42% |
Volatility
AIRR vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a higher volatility of 9.32% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) at 7.21%. This indicates that AIRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIRR | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.32% | 7.21% | +2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.81% | 15.09% | +5.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.19% | 19.38% | +6.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.45% | 25.90% | -0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.36% | 25.77% | +0.59% |
AIRR vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIRR has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIRR vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison
AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, more than FBCG's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 0.13% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.43% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIRR and FBCG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIRR has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to FBCG (7.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIRR dropped -42.37% vs FBCG's -43.56%.
On 5-year performance, AIRR leads with 25.46% vs 14.46% for FBCG. On fees, FBCG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FBCG has been the lower-risk option at 7.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 25.46% return vs 14.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FBCG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIRR.
AIRR has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.
AIRR is categorized as Building & Construction, while FBCG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIRR and 0.59% for FBCG.
AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIRR and FBCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer