AIQ vs. XLE
AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AIQ returned 16.96%/yr vs 20.12%/yr for XLE. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIQ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
AIQ vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIQ achieves a 25.84% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 29.56% return.
AIQ
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 25.84%
- 6M
- 26.79%
- 1Y
- 52.00%
- 3Y*
- 32.14%
- 5Y*
- 16.96%
- 10Y*
- —
XLE
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 29.56%
- 6M
- 28.37%
- 1Y
- 37.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
AIQ vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 25.84% | 31.89% | 24.11% | 55.39% | -36.44% | 17.09% | 52.88% | 39.94% | -14.05% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.56% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -24.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIQ and XLE is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.28 |
The correlation between AIQ and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AIQ vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIQ
XLE
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
AIQ
XLE
-
Communication Services
AIQ
XLE
-
Consumer Cyclical
AIQ
XLE
-
Industrials
AIQ
XLE
-
Healthcare
AIQ
XLE
-
Financial Services
AIQ
XLE
-
Basic Materials
AIQ
-
XLE
-
Consumer Defensive
AIQ
-
XLE
-
Energy
AIQ
-
XLE
Real Estate
AIQ
-
XLE
-
Utilities
AIQ
-
XLE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIQ vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
AIQ
XLE
AIQ vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIQ | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.30 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 3.10 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.43 | 8.63 | +1.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIQ vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIQ drawdown since its inception was -44.66%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIQ and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIQ | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.66% | -71.26% | +26.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.47% | -12.05% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.35% | -20.14% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.66% | -26.04% | -18.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.75% | -8.01% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.79% | -17.97% | +8.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.00% | 4.32% | +0.68% |
Volatility
AIQ vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a higher volatility of 12.90% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 7.26%. This indicates that AIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIQ | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.90% | 7.26% | +5.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.38% | 16.79% | +4.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.31% | 20.57% | +4.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 26.05% | -0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.71% | 29.58% | -3.87% |
AIQ vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIQ vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
AIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than XLE's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.59% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIQ and XLE have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIQ has higher volatility (12.90%) compared to XLE (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIQ dropped -44.66% vs XLE's -71.26%.
On 5-year performance, XLE leads with 20.12% vs 16.96% for AIQ. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLE has performed better with a 20.12% return vs 16.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.15% for AIQ.
AIQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for AIQ and 0.08% for XLE.
AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIQ and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer