PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIQ vs. URA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIQ vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIQ achieves a 19.09% return, which is significantly higher than URA's -4.49% return.


AIQ

1D
2.85%
1M
-2.07%
6M
15.64%
YTD
19.09%
1Y
39.46%
3Y*
28.94%
5Y*
14.71%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.89%

URA

1D
4.45%
1M
-5.60%
6M
-23.39%
YTD
-4.49%
1Y
11.87%
3Y*
27.86%
5Y*
20.93%
10Y*
15.21%
ALL TIME*
-3.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$119.65M$125.66M$166.59M
$125.37M$115.54M$169.15M

AIQ vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
19.09%31.89%24.11%55.39%-36.44%17.09%52.88%39.94%-14.05%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
-4.49%67.18%-0.58%46.25%-11.32%57.57%41.33%-3.54%-15.05%

Correlation

The correlation between AIQ and URA is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018

0.54

The correlation between AIQ and URA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIQ vs. URA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIQ
URA

Technology

78.8%
0.9%

Communication Services

10.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%

-

Industrials

3.6%
21.4%

Financial Services

0.5%

-

Healthcare

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

4.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

58.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

7.1%

Technology

AIQ
78.8%
URA
0.9%

Communication Services

AIQ
10.1%
URA

-

Consumer Cyclical

AIQ
6.6%
URA

-

Industrials

AIQ
3.6%
URA
21.4%

Financial Services

AIQ
0.5%
URA

-

Healthcare

AIQ
0.4%
URA

-

Basic Materials

AIQ

-

URA
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

AIQ

-

URA

-

Energy

AIQ

-

URA
58.7%

Real Estate

AIQ

-

URA

-

Utilities

AIQ

-

URA
7.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIQ vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIQ
AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

URA
URA Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIQ vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIQURADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.08

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

0.30

+1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.85

0.65

+5.20

AIQ vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the URA Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIQ and URA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIQ vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIQ drawdown since its inception was -44.66%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIQ and URA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIQURADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.66%

-93.54%

+48.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.19%

-39.30%

+19.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.35%

-39.30%

+12.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.66%

-39.30%

-5.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.64%

-53.69%

+40.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.82%

-74.74%

+64.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.76%

18.23%

-11.47%

Volatility

AIQ vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) is 10.54%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 14.37%. This indicates that AIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIQURADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.54%

14.37%

-3.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.90%

37.93%

-13.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.63%

52.40%

-23.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.45%

44.16%

-17.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.99%

38.14%

-12.15%

AIQ vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIQ vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

AIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than URA's 5.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
0.08%0.18%0.14%0.16%0.56%0.15%0.50%0.51%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
5.11%4.88%2.86%6.07%0.76%5.84%1.69%1.66%0.44%2.03%7.28%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIQ and URA have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URA has higher volatility (14.37%) compared to AIQ (10.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIQ dropped -44.66% vs URA's -93.54%.

On 5-year performance, URA leads with 20.93% vs 14.71% for AIQ. On fees, AIQ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, AIQ has been the lower-risk option at 10.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, URA has performed better with a 20.93% return vs 14.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIQ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.

URA has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 0.08% for AIQ.

AIQ is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while URA is Uranium. AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for AIQ and 0.69% for URA.

AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIQ and URA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer