AIQ vs. SMH
AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AIQ returned 19.07%/yr vs 39.21%/yr for SMH. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AIQ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
AIQ vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIQ achieves a 35.98% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return.
AIQ
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 21.10%
- YTD
- 35.98%
- 6M
- 36.15%
- 1Y
- 69.19%
- 3Y*
- 37.50%
- 5Y*
- 19.07%
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 25.87%
- YTD
- 77.13%
- 6M
- 75.61%
- 1Y
- 157.20%
- 3Y*
- 64.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.21%
- 10Y*
- 37.68%
AIQ vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 35.98% | 31.89% | 24.11% | 55.39% | -36.44% | 17.09% | 52.88% | 39.94% | -14.03% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 77.13% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -16.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIQ and SMH is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018 | 0.84 |
The correlation between AIQ and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
AIQ vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIQ
SMH
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
AIQ
SMH
Communication Services
AIQ
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
AIQ
SMH
-
Industrials
AIQ
SMH
-
Healthcare
AIQ
SMH
-
Financial Services
AIQ
SMH
-
Basic Materials
AIQ
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
AIQ
-
SMH
-
Energy
AIQ
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
AIQ
-
SMH
-
Utilities
AIQ
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIQ vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
AIQ
SMH
AIQ vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIQ | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.72 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | 10.59 | -6.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.59 | 40.63 | -26.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIQ | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.02 | 5.19 | -2.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 1.13 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.34 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
AIQ vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIQ drawdown since its inception was -44.66%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIQ and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIQ | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.66% | -84.96% | +40.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.47% | -14.93% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.35% | -35.74% | +9.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.66% | -45.30% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | 0.00% | -1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.80% | -41.09% | +31.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.76% | 3.89% | +0.87% |
Volatility
AIQ vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) is 8.60%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.47%. This indicates that AIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIQ | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.60% | 11.47% | -2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.46% | 24.29% | -5.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.04% | 30.56% | -7.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.33% | 35.01% | -9.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.50% | 32.57% | -7.07% |
AIQ vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIQ vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
AIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.14% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIQ and SMH have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to AIQ (8.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIQ dropped -44.66% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 5-year performance, SMH leads with 39.21% vs 19.07% for AIQ. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, AIQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMH has performed better with a 39.21% return vs 19.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.
SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.14% for AIQ.
AIQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for AIQ and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs 3.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIQ and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer