PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIPO vs. XMAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIPO vs. XMAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIPO achieves a 50.90% return, which is significantly higher than XMAG's 12.54% return.


AIPO

1D
-0.74%
1M
3.63%
YTD
50.90%
6M
40.68%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XMAG

1D
-0.17%
1M
5.41%
YTD
12.54%
6M
13.14%
1Y
24.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIPO vs. XMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIPO and XMAG is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025

0.67

AIPO vs. XMAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIPO
XMAG

Industrials

57.1%
12.6%

Technology

16.5%
25.3%

Utilities

14.4%
3.4%

Energy

6.9%
5.5%

Financial Services

3.6%
17.3%

Real Estate

1.0%
2.9%

Communication Services

0.5%
3.9%

Basic Materials

-

2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.3%

Healthcare

-

13.0%

Industrials

AIPO
57.1%
XMAG
12.6%

Technology

AIPO
16.5%
XMAG
25.3%

Utilities

AIPO
14.4%
XMAG
3.4%

Energy

AIPO
6.9%
XMAG
5.5%

Financial Services

AIPO
3.6%
XMAG
17.3%

Real Estate

AIPO
1.0%
XMAG
2.9%

Communication Services

AIPO
0.5%
XMAG
3.9%

Basic Materials

AIPO

-

XMAG
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

AIPO

-

XMAG
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

AIPO

-

XMAG
7.3%

Healthcare

AIPO

-

XMAG
13.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIPO vs. XMAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIPO

XMAG
XMAG Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIPO vs. XMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AIPO vs. XMAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIPOXMAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.30

1.10

+1.20

Drawdowns

AIPO vs. XMAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIPO drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, which is greater than XMAG's maximum drawdown of -16.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIPO and XMAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIPOXMAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.31%

-16.17%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-0.17%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-2.12%

-2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

Volatility

AIPO vs. XMAG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIPOXMAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.02%

11.10%

+22.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.02%

15.10%

+18.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.02%

15.10%

+18.92%

AIPO vs. XMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIPO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than XMAG's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIPO vs. XMAG - Dividend Comparison

AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than XMAG's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AIPO
Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF
0.01%0.01%0.00%
XMAG
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF
0.46%0.51%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIPO and XMAG have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMAG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMAG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.

XMAG has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.

AIPO is categorized as Technology Equities, while XMAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while XMAG tracks BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIPO and 0.35% for XMAG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIPO and XMAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer