AIPO vs. SOXQ
AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIPO is a Building & Construction fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AIPO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
AIPO vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIPO achieves a 47.24% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 99.17% return.
AIPO
- 1D
- 3.56%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 47.24%
- 6M
- 44.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXQ
- 1D
- 5.38%
- 1M
- 21.68%
- YTD
- 99.17%
- 6M
- 101.86%
- 1Y
- 176.72%
- 3Y*
- 57.50%
- 5Y*
- 35.68%
- 10Y*
- —
AIPO vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 47.24% | 9.46% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 99.17% | 25.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIPO and SOXQ is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.83 |
AIPO vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIPO
SOXQ
Industrials
-
Technology
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
AIPO
SOXQ
-
Technology
AIPO
SOXQ
Utilities
AIPO
SOXQ
-
Energy
AIPO
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
AIPO
SOXQ
Real Estate
AIPO
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
AIPO
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
AIPO
-
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
AIPO
-
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
AIPO
-
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
AIPO
-
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIPO vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
AIPO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SOXQ
AIPO vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIPO | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.66 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 11.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 41.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIPO vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIPO drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIPO and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIPO | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.31% | -46.01% | +28.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.23% | 0.00% | -4.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | -12.91% | +8.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.28% | — |
Volatility
AIPO vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIPO | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.27% | 37.08% | -1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.27% | 36.97% | -1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.27% | 36.93% | -1.66% |
AIPO vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIPO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIPO vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than SOXQ's 0.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIPO and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.
SOXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.
AIPO is categorized as Building & Construction, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIPO and 0.19% for SOXQ.
Find the right allocation for AIPO and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer